Posted on behalf of Arnold Law Firm on April 4, 2025 in Data Breach
On April 2, 2025, Nevro Corp. (“Nevro”) reported a significant cybersecurity incident to the California Attorney General’s office. The following day, April 3, 2025, Nevro filed another notice with the Texas Attorney General’s office, indicating that approximately 6,381 Texans were affected by the incident. According to Nevro’s notice, on December 1, 2024, the company became aware of suspicious activity on its network. A subsequent investigation determined that an unauthorized third party gained access to a small number of Nevro’s systems and obtained certain private and confidential information from the network between November 21 and December 1, 2024 (“Data Breach”).
Recently, Nevro began sending data breach notification letters to those affected by the Data Breach. Each notice includes an offer of complimentary credit monitoring and identity theft protection services for impacted individuals. If you received a data breach notification letter from Nevro, it indicates that you were affected by the data breach.
Nevro Corp., founded in 2006 and headquartered in Redwood City, California, specializes in chronic pain management solutions, notably its HFX™ spinal cord stimulation platform featuring proprietary 10 kHz Therapy™. On April 3, 2025, Globus Medical completed its acquisition of Nevro for approximately $250 million, aiming to expand Nevro’s high-frequency technology reach. As of December 31, 2024, Nevro employed approximately 1,099 individuals and reported an annual revenue of $408.5 million.
While Nevro has not released the exact information compromised, it likely includes:
This information is called your Personally Identifiable Information (“PII”). It tells others about you and is considered part of your identity. Businesses are required to secure this information or risk facing statutory penalties, among other legal penalties. Stolen PII can be used by identity thieves to engage in fraudulent activity using your identity.
Personal medical information (a specific type of PII) is referred to as Protected Health Information (“PHI”). It is protected under both state and federal law. Healthcare providers and other businesses who handle PHI are required to protect that information. Like stolen PII, stolen PHI can be used by identity thieves to engage in fraudulent activity using your identity. Quite often, PII and PHI are used in conjunction by hackers.
The best way to protect yourself after a data breach is to sign up for credit and identity protection services as soon as possible.
California offers extra protections and legal rights to its residents through the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”).
NOTICE: If you received a NOTICE OF DATA BREACH letter from Nevro Corp., contact the Arnold Law Firm at (916) 777-7777 to discuss your legal options, or submit a confidential Case Evaluation form here.
"*" indicates required fields
The Arnold Law Firm reached a settlement in the Morgan Stanley data breach class action lawsuit. The settlement resulted in a $60 million settlement fund to benefit class members.
Learn MoreA whistleblower case exposing fraudulent practices in the state of California resulted in an $18.275 million settlement.
Learn MoreThe Arnold Law Firm reached a settlement in the Kemper and Infinity data breach class action lawsuit. The settlement is valued at over $17 million.
Learn MoreThe Arnold Law Firm is pleased to report that our attorneys received a $10.2 million verdict handed down in Modesto. Defense counsel was Kevin Cholakian of San Francisco. The defense rejected a 998 within the $1 million policy limits three years ago. The highest defense offer was $350k. The case involved a blind corner dirt […]
Learn MoreLate one spring afternoon, the Arnold Law Firm received a call from Angela, a young mother of three. She was calling from the hospital where her husband Christopher had been air-lifted for treatment of severe injuries from a tragic motor vehicle accident earlier that day. Angela’s mother, a past client of our firm, had encouraged […]
Learn MoreThe fatal collision between plaintiff’s Jeep Liberty and defendant’s Volvo truck left Ryan Eisenbrandt’s surviving wife and parents with a judgment of $3.9 million, but the defendant’s insurance company refused to pay. This resulted in a second, intense legal battle between Plaintiffs and Defendant’s insurance company. During the pendency of the wrongful death case, Defendant’s […]
Learn More