Posted on behalf of Arnold Law Firm
on May 14, 2025 in Data Breach
Updated on September 1, 2025
On May 8, 2025, Chambers County Public Hospital District No. 1 (“Chambers Health”)reported a significant cybersecurity incident to the Texas Attorney General’s Office. The incident, which began with a network disruption on July 19, 2024, was later confirmed to involve unauthorized access to sensitive personal and health information (the “Data Breach”). Approximately 84,082 individuals have been impacted.
The investigation revealed that an unauthorized third party accessed and acquired personal data. Notably, on December 5, 2024, a threat actor known as “mapateam” claimed responsibility for the Data Breach, alleging the theft of 1.52TB of documents, including private and financial information, which were posted on the open web.
Recently, Chambers Health began sending data breach notification letters to individuals affected by the Data Breach. Each letter offers one year of complimentary credit monitoring and identity theft protection services. As of now, Chambers Health has not disclosed any further information about the Data Breach. If you received a data breach notification letter from Chambers Health, it indicates that your information was affected by the Data Breach.
Established over 70 years ago, Chambers County Public Hospital is a public hospital organization serving Chambers County, Texas. The district provides essential healthcare services to residents in Anahuac and the surrounding communities and is governed by a five-member Board of Directors elected by local taxpayers.
The types of information compromised vary by individual but may include the following:
This information is called your Personally Identifiable Information (“PII”). It tells others about you and is considered part of your identity. Businesses are required to secure this information or risk facing statutory penalties, among other legal penalties. Stolen PII can be used by identity thieves to engage in fraudulent activity using your identity.
Personal medical information (a specific type of PII) is referred to as Protected Health Information (“PHI”). It is protected under both state and federal law. Healthcare providers and other businesses who handle PHI are required to protect that information. Like stolen PII, stolen PHI can be used by identity thieves to engage in fraudulent activity using your identity. Quite often, PII and PHI are used in conjunction by hackers.
The best way to protect yourself after a data breach is to sign up for credit and identity protection services as soon as possible.
California offers extra protections and legal rights to its residents through the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”).
NOTICE: If you received a NOTICE OF DATA BREACH letter from Chambers County Public Hospital District No. 1, contact the Arnold Law Firm at (916) 777-7777 to discuss your legal options, or submit a confidential Case Evaluation form here.
"*" indicates required fields
The Arnold Law Firm reached a settlement in the Morgan Stanley data breach class action lawsuit. The settlement resulted in a $60 million settlement fund to benefit class members.
Learn MoreA whistleblower case exposing fraudulent practices in the state of California resulted in an $18.275 million settlement.
Learn MoreThe Arnold Law Firm reached a settlement in the Kemper and Infinity data breach class action lawsuit. The settlement is valued at over $17 million.
Learn MoreThe Arnold Law Firm is pleased to report that our attorneys received a $10.2 million verdict handed down in Modesto. Defense counsel was Kevin Cholakian of San Francisco. The defense rejected a 998 within the $1 million policy limits three years ago. The highest defense offer was $350k. The case involved a blind corner dirt […]
Learn MoreLate one spring afternoon, the Arnold Law Firm received a call from Angela, a young mother of three. She was calling from the hospital where her husband Christopher had been air-lifted for treatment of severe injuries from a tragic motor vehicle accident earlier that day. Angela’s mother, a past client of our firm, had encouraged […]
Learn MoreThe fatal collision between plaintiff’s Jeep Liberty and defendant’s Volvo truck left Ryan Eisenbrandt’s surviving wife and parents with a judgment of $3.9 million, but the defendant’s insurance company refused to pay. This resulted in a second, intense legal battle between Plaintiffs and Defendant’s insurance company. During the pendency of the wrongful death case, Defendant’s […]
Learn More