When more than two vehicles are involved, car accident claims can become much more complicated. How is fault assigned with this type of accident? Do you need to file multiple claims to pursue compensation?
If you were injured in a car accident and multiple drivers could be to blame, consider hiring an experienced attorney. You can request a free, no-obligation consultation with our car accident lawyers to learn what legal options may be available to help you recover compensation.
The state of California follows a pure comparative negligence system, which allows a percentage of fault to be assigned to each party found liable for an accident. Each party is financially responsible for a percentage of your damages based on its percentage of fault. For example, if a party is found to be 30 percent at fault, they must pay 30 percent of damages you have suffered.
California’s pure comparative negligence system also explains what happens when a victim is partially at fault. Proportional damages may be pursued if another driver is at all at fault. This means that, technically, you could pursue compensation if another party is even one percent responsible.
Some states prevent victims from recovering compensation if they are found to be more than 50 percent at fault for the accident that caused their damages. In California, it is possible to hold a higher percentage of fault than the other parties involved and still be eligible to recover compensation.
However, under this pure comparative negligence system, your compensation award is reduced by your percentage of fault. For example, if you file a claim for $50,000 in damages and are found to be 60 percent at fault, you would only receive $20,000, which is 60 percent less than the full amount.
Rear-end crashes often involve multiple vehicles. The first vehicle that was struck is pushed into the vehicle in front, which is pushed into another vehicle and so on. These accidents can involve numerous vehicles, and typically, the driver of the rear vehicle that caused the first collision is found to be at fault.
However, that is not always the case. Some of the other drivers in the chain may be at fault if they were tailgating or not paying attention and could have stopped before crashing into the vehicle in front.
Your attorney and the insurance companies may consider numerous factors when determining fault for a multi-vehicle accident, such as:
The Sacramento car accident lawyers of the Arnold Law Firm help victims recover maximum compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering.
Schedule a free, no-obligation consultation today. We charge no upfront fees and you only pay us if we successfully recover compensation on your behalf.
Wrongfully blamed: What really happened to Randy Stevens
Randy Stevens opened his eyes and saw his wife standing over him in a hospital room. He had no idea what had happened. His last memory was of standing next to his truck trailer and watching as a Security Contractor Services forklift driver struggled to load an ungainly pallet of...Learn More
Last winter, a commercial truck and trailer made an abrupt wide turn into the path of a 24-year-old motorcyclist. The resulting collision sent Justin to the hospital with a collapsed lung, multiple fractured bones and a traumatic brain injury.
Justin's mother realized that her son needed legal help. While he was still in a coma...Learn More