CALL 916-777-7777
Youtube Facebook-f X-twitter Linkedin-in

Sacramento Burn Injury Lawyer

FREE EVALUATION (916) 777-7777

Compassionate Burn Injury Attorneys in Sacramento

At Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys, we are dedicated to providing the highest level of legal help for burn victims in Sacramento. Our experienced team understands the physical, emotional, and financial toll that burn injuries can impose. With years of experience and a proven track record, our firm has established itself as the best burn injury lawyers in Sacramento for those seeking justice and fair compensation.

We pride ourselves on being a trusted burn injury law firm in Sacramento, with countless satisfied clients who have benefited from our relentless advocacy. From helping victims navigate the burn injury settlement process to ensuring they receive full compensation for burn injuries, our Sacramento burn injury lawyers are committed to achieving the best possible outcome for your case.

Our attorneys specialize in filing burn injury claims resulting from severe accidents, including workplace incidents, defective products, and vehicle-related fires. We understand the complexities of these cases and offer personalized support tailored to your unique needs.

Read our Client Testimonials and explore our Case Results to see how we’ve helped others in similar situations.

"*" indicates required fields

Address*
SMS*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

SETTLEMENT

$60,000,000

Data Breach

The Arnold Law Firm reached a settlement in the Morgan Stanley data breach class action lawsuit.

Learn More

SETTLEMENT

$18,276,000

Qui Tam / Whistleblower

A whistleblower case exposing fraudulent practices in the state of California resulted…
Learn More

SETTLEMENT

$17,000,000

Data Breach

The Arnold Law Firm reached a settlement in the Kemper and Infinity data breach…
Learn More

SETTLEMENT

$17,000,000

Data Breach

The Arnold Law Firm reached a settlement in the Kemper and Infinity data breach…
Learn More

SETTLEMENT

$8,000,000

Truck Accident

Late one spring afternoon, the Arnold Law Firm received a call from Angela, a young…
Learn More

JUDGEMENT

$3,900,000

Car Accident

The fatal collision between plaintiff’s Jeep Liberty and defendant’s Volvo truck…
Learn More

Understanding Burn Injuries Under California Law

A burn injury is defined as damage to the skin and underlying tissues caused by heat, chemicals, or electricity. These injuries vary in severity and are classified into degrees, with third-degree burns being the most severe, often resulting in extensive tissue damage and potential long-term consequences.

Each year in the United States, approximately 450,000 individuals require medical attention for burn injuries, according to the American Burn Association (ABA). Tragically, an estimated 4,000 people lose their lives annually due to burns, with residential fires accounting for 3,500 of these deaths. Other common causes include motor vehicle accidents, chemical exposure, and contact with hot liquids or substances.

Burn injuries often have profound physical and emotional impacts. For instance, severe burns can lead to chronic pain, scarring, disfigurement, and psychological trauma, all of which require long-term care and support. The ABA also reports that men make up nearly 71% of burn victims, with children under five accounting for 17% of cases. Furthermore, 65% of burns occur in the home, underscoring the importance of fire safety.

California law protects burn victims by allowing them to seek compensation for burn injuries caused by negligence. Partnering with a Sacramento burn injury lawyer ensures victims receive the legal help they need to navigate the burn injury settlement process effectively.

"*" indicates required fields

Address*
SMS*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Common Causes of Burn Injuries in Sacramento

Burn injuries can arise from numerous incidents, many of which are caused by negligence and could have been avoided. Below are some of the most common causes of burn injuries in Sacramento:

  • Fires and Explosions: Residential fires, gas leaks, and improperly stored flammable materials are among the leading causes of burn injuries. Explosions, particularly in industrial or residential settings, often result in severe burns and other traumatic injuries.
  • Workplace Accidents: Construction sites, manufacturing facilities, and commercial kitchens are high-risk environments where unsafe conditions, lack of training, or defective equipment can lead to burn injuries. Employees injured on the job should seek legal help for burn victims in Sacramento to ensure their rights are protected.
  • Defective Products: Faulty products such as space heaters, electrical appliances, or defective vehicle parts can cause fires or electrical burns. Learn more about product liability on our Product Liability page.
  • Electrical Burns: Exposure to live wires or malfunctioning electrical systems can result in severe electrical burns, often causing deep tissue damage.
  • Car and Truck Accidents: Collisions involving vehicles carrying flammable substances or fuel-related fires often lead to catastrophic burns. These incidents may involve complex liability issues, and filing a burn injury claim is essential to secure compensation.

If you’ve suffered a burn injury due to negligence, an experienced Sacramento burn injury attorney can help you navigate the burn injury settlement process. 

Types of Burn Injuries We Handle

Burn injuries can cause immense pain, long-term health complications, and financial burdens. At Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys, we have extensive experience helping victims of all types of burn injuries, including:

  • Thermal Burns: These burns occur when skin comes into contact with hot surfaces, flames, or steam. Thermal burns are common in house fires, workplace accidents, and vehicle collisions.
  • Chemical Burns: Exposure to hazardous chemicals like acids, cleaning agents, or industrial substances can lead to serious chemical burns. These injuries often require specialized medical care and legal expertise to pursue compensation. 
  • Electrical Burns: Electrical burns occur when a person is exposed to high-voltage currents, often resulting in internal injuries alongside visible skin damage.
  • Radiation Burns: Prolonged exposure to radiation, such as sunburn or radiation therapy, can result in painful and lasting damage to the skin and tissues.
  • Severe Scalding Injuries: Hot liquids or steam can cause significant skin damage and are particularly common in residential or workplace accidents.

WE FIGHT FOR YOUR MAXIMUM INJURY COMPENSATION

Free Case Evaluation
CALL 916-777-7777

Types of Compensation Available for Burn Injuries

If you’ve suffered a burn injury, understanding your potential compensation is essential for rebuilding your life. At Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys, we’re committed to helping victims navigate the burn injury settlement process and pursue the compensation they deserve. Common types of compensation include:

  • Medical Expenses and Rehabilitation: This includes costs for hospital stays, surgeries, physical therapy, and any future medical treatments. Burn injuries often require extensive care, which can lead to significant financial burdens.
  • Assistive Devices and Home Modifications: Severe burns may result in permanent disabilities requiring specialized equipment or home adjustments. These costs should be accounted for in your claim.
  • Lost Wages and Earning Potential: Compensation for income lost during recovery and diminished earning capacity due to long-term injuries.
  • Pain, Suffering, and Emotional Distress: The physical pain and emotional trauma of burn injuries are significant, and you may be entitled to non-economic damages to address these impacts.

At Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys, we pride ourselves on being the best burn injury lawyer in Sacramento for those seeking justice. 

California’s Statute of Limitations for Burn Injury Cases

California law imposes a strict two-year statute of limitations for filing a burn injury claim in most cases. This means that if you’ve suffered a burn injury due to someone else’s negligence, you generally have two years from the date of the injury to pursue legal action. Acting promptly is crucial, as missing this deadline can prevent you from seeking compensation for your damages.

There are, however, exceptions to this rule:

  • Minors: If the victim is under 18 at the time of the injury, the statute of limitations may be extended until their 18th birthday, giving them more time to file a claim.
  • Claims Against Government Entities: When a burn injury is caused by a government agency or employee, the timeline is much shorter. You typically have six months to file a claim, and specific procedures must be followed to preserve your case.

Given these complexities, it’s crucial to consult with a Sacramento burn injury attorney promptly to ensure your claim is filed within the appropriate timeframe. 

"*" indicates required fields

Address*
SMS*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Who Can Be Held Liable for Burn Injuries?

California law allows burn injury victims to seek compensation by identifying the parties responsible for their injuries. Working with an experienced Sacramento burn injury lawyer is crucial to navigating this process effectively. Commonly liable parties include:

  • Negligent Employers: Employers may be held responsible for workplace burn injuries resulting from unsafe conditions or failure to follow safety standards.
  • Property Owners: Burn injuries on unsafe premises—such as those caused by poorly maintained fireplaces—can lead to premises liability claims. 
  • Manufacturers of Defective Products: Defective products that cause burns, such as malfunctioning appliances or faulty space heaters, may lead to claims against manufacturers. 
  • Negligent Drivers: Vehicle fires or fuel explosions caused by reckless or impaired drivers are another common source of burn injuries. 

Understanding who is liable is key to pursuing compensation for burn injuries. An experienced Sacramento injury lawyer at Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys can provide personalized guidance through the burn injury settlement process. 

How Much Compensation Is a Burn Injury Claim?

The compensation available in a burn injury case depends on the severity of the injuries and their impact on your life. Consulting with a Sacramento burn injury attorney ensures you receive a comprehensive evaluation of your claim. Key factors influencing compensation include:

  • Medical Treatments: Costs for surgeries, skin grafts, rehabilitation, and other necessary treatments. Severe burns may require ongoing medical care. For cases involving defective products, review our blog on filing an injury claim after a space heater fire.
  • Lost Income and Reduced Earning Capacity: If your injuries prevent you from working, you may recover compensation for lost wages and diminished ability to earn in the future.
  • Pain, Suffering, and Disfigurement: Compensation accounts for physical pain, emotional distress, and the psychological toll of disfigurement. Learn about similar claims involving motorcycle road rash.
  • Long-Term Care Needs: Severe injuries often necessitate long-term therapy, personal assistance, or home modifications to accommodate disabilities.

At Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys, we are committed to helping victims navigate the burn injury settlement process. Schedule a free consultation burn injury attorney session today to discuss your case. We’ll assist you in filing a burn injury claim and fight to secure maximum compensation for burn injuries.

"*" indicates required fields

Address*
SMS*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

How Long Does It Take to Settle a Burn Injury Case?

The timeline for settling a burn injury case can vary greatly depending on several key factors, including:

  1. Severity of Injuries: Severe burn injuries often involve extended medical treatments and recovery times, such as surgeries, skin grafts, and physical therapy. As you recover, your Sacramento burn injury lawyer will assess your long-term medical needs, which can impact how quickly a case is resolved.
  2. Complexity of the Case: The more parties involved, such as employers, product manufacturers, or negligent drivers, the more complex your case will be. Complex cases may take longer to investigate and resolve, as multiple sources of liability need to be evaluated.
  3. Insurance Negotiations: Insurance companies may be reluctant to offer a fair settlement, prolonging the process. A Severe accident attorney can help navigate these challenges and ensure you’re not left with inadequate compensation for your injuries.

Why Choose Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys for Your Burn Injury Case?

When it comes to filing a burn injury claim, choosing the right attorney is crucial to securing the best possible outcome for your case. At Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys, we offer a client-focused approach, ensuring that you receive the support and compensation you deserve. Here’s why you should choose our Burn injury law firm Sacramento for your burn injury case:

  1. Investigating Incidents: Our team works diligently to investigate the circumstances surrounding your burn injury. By identifying all responsible parties, we can build a strong case to hold them accountable for their negligence.
  2. Building Strong Legal Cases: We understand the complexities of burn injury cases and use our knowledge to gather critical evidence, such as medical records, expert testimony, and accident reports. This helps us craft a solid legal strategy tailored to your situation.
  3. Negotiating with Insurance Companies: Insurance companies often try to minimize payouts, but our Severe accident attorneys are skilled negotiators who will fight to ensure you receive fair compensation for your injuries, medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.
  4. Representing Clients in Court: If negotiations do not lead to a fair settlement, we are fully prepared to take your case to court. Our experienced attorneys will vigorously represent you to secure the justice you deserve.

For a free consultation burn injury attorney, contact Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys today. Let us handle your legal matters so you can focus on recovery.

Contact Our Sacramento Burn Injury Lawyers Today

If you or a loved one has suffered a burn injury, don’t wait to seek the legal help you need. At Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys, our team of Sacramento burn injury lawyers is dedicated to supporting burn victims in their pursuit of justice and fair compensation. Whether you’re dealing with severe burns from a workplace accident, a defective product, or a vehicle-related fire, our experienced Sacramento injury lawyers are here to help.

We offer a free consultation burn injury attorney to discuss the details of your case and determine the best course of action. We’ll guide you through the burn injury settlement process, helping you understand your legal rights and options for filing a burn injury claim. We are committed to securing the compensation you deserve for medical expenses, lost wages, pain, suffering, and long-term care needs.

If you need trusted legal help for burn victims in Sacramento, don’t hesitate to contact us. We’re here to fight for your rights every step of the way.

Contact us today for your free consultation and let us put our experience to work for you for your personal injury claim.

LATEST NEWS

Treble Damages in California Trucking Cases

justice4you January 30, 2026

California law provides a specific statutory remedy for victims injured by impaired commercial vehicle drivers when their employers fail to meet federal safety requirements. Understanding when treble damages apply—and how they differ from standard punitive damages—is crucial for truck accident victims seeking maximum compensation. What Are Treble Damages? Treble damages allow injured parties to recover three times their actual damages under specific legal circumstances. In California trucking cases, this remedy is narrowly defined and differs significantly from general punitive damages available in other personal injury cases. California Civil Code § 3333.7: Statutory Treble Damages Requirements for Recovery Under California Civil Code § 3333.7, injured parties may recover treble damages from a commercial motor vehicle driver’s employer when all of the

California Trucking Accidents: Standards of Care

justice4you January 29, 2026

California law establishes different standards of care for trucking operations depending on the type of service provided. While most commercial trucking companies transporting freight are subject to ordinary negligence standards, federal motor carrier safety regulations impose enhanced duties that can significantly affect liability in truck accident cases. Key Takeaways: Commercial carriers of goods generally DO NOT have the duty of “utmost care” Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) DO create heightened standards in specific situations Large truck drivers must exercise greater caution than ordinary motorists Licensed motor carriers have nondelegable safety duties Common Carrier Standard: When Does “Utmost Care” Apply? The Enhanced Duty for Passenger Transportation California Civil Code section 2100 requires carriers of persons for reward to use “the

Punitive Damages in California Personal Injury Cases

justice4you January 28, 2026

What Are Punitive Damages? Punitive damages are extra money a court can order a wrongdoer to pay, on top of the money that compensates an injured person for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. The main goal of punitive damages is not to repay the victim, but to punish especially bad behavior and to discourage similar conduct in the future. Think of punitive damages as a financial penalty for conduct that is much worse than ordinary carelessness. In California, punitive damages are not common. They are reserved for cases where the defendant’s conduct is particularly harmful, intentional, or shows a conscious disregard for the safety or rights of others. Most personal injury cases involve simple negligence (for example,

Settlement - $3,900,000

Car Accident

The fatal collision between plaintiff’s Jeep Liberty and defendant’s Volvo truck left Ryan Eisenbrandt’s surviving wife and parents with a judgment of $3.9 million, but the defendant’s insurance company refused to pay. This resulted in a second, intense legal battle between Plaintiffs and Defendant’s insurance company.

During the pendency of the wrongful death case, Defendant’s insurance company had filed a federal court action to rescind the defendants $1,000,000 insurance policy, claiming that defendant had made misrepresentations when applying for that policy. Initially, the federal court agreed with the insurance company, granting summary judgment that effectively denied recovery to the Eisenbrandts given the defendant was otherwise insolvent. The Arnold firm and the Eisenbrandts refused to accept this unfair outcome. They appealed the federal judge’s ruling to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Ninth Circuit reversed the lower court and sent the case back to the same federal judge for a trial on the merits.

Christine Doyle of the Arnold Firm tried the case in February 2011 in front of the same judge who had previously thrown out the Eisenbrandt’s case. A unanimous advisory jury and the trial judge, after hearing the true facts about the insurance company’s effort to avoid responsibility, found in the Eisenbrandts favor. After four years of fighting for what is right, the insurance company was ordered to pay up.

Settlement - $8,000,000

Truck Accident

Morgan Stanley Class Action Data Breach Settlement Attained by the Arnold Law Firm

Late one spring afternoon, the Arnold Law Firm received a call from Angela, a young mother of three. She was calling from the hospital where her husband Christopher had been air-lifted for treatment of severe injuries from a tragic motor vehicle accident earlier that day. Angela’s mother, a past client of our firm, had encouraged her to give us a call.

As it turns out, Angela’s prompt contact with us was a very important decision for their family. Immediate representation allowed our team to secure critical evidence right away — appropriate storage and analysis of the vehicle to avoid tampering, timely professional photography of the scene, and interviews of involved parties — which ended up being imperative to the details of Christopher’s case.

A commercial vehicle had failed to stop at a rural stop-sign intersection, colliding with the compact sedan driven by Christopher, an active 33-year-old father. The impact caused extensive damage to his spinal cord in the cervical area. Despite multiple surgeries, rehabilitation programs for physical and psychological therapy, and in-home care, his injuries rendered him a paraplegic, paralyzed from the mid-chest. In an instant, life as he had known it was gone forever.

At the time of the accident, the at-fault driver of the commercial vehicle was acting within the scope of his employment with a large corporation. With the employer being directly liable, as such, defense counsel fought hard to minimize Christopher’s damages, claiming that his being unemployed at that time devalued his losses. Our legal team made sure Christopher’s true losses were represented, including his potential income, his options and mobility, his ability to provide for and support his family, and the lifetime of care he now needed. Christopher’s injuries also dramatically affected his spouse’s daily life, resulting in a claim on her behalf.

Furthermore, the extent of Christopher’s injuries were, in part, due to defects involving the dual-restraint system in his own vehicle. Despite the manufacturer’s efforts to deny any responsibility, the Arnold Law Firm established negligence relevant to his case.

The result was a settlement of $8 million — the largest pre-trial settlement for this type of case in the region. Christopher now has the resources to receive the ongoing care he now requires, improve the quality of his life and take care of his young family.

Verdict - $10,200,000

Motorcycle Accident

The Arnold Law Firm is pleased to report that our attorneys received a $10.2 million verdict handed down in Modesto. Defense counsel was Kevin Cholakian of San Francisco. The defense rejected a 998 within the $1 million policy limits three years ago. The highest defense offer was $350k.

The case involved a blind corner dirt fire road collision between a truck driven by the defendant and a motorcycle driven by the plaintiff Dan Nixon. THe plaintiff had no recollection of the collision. The defendant claimed that the plaintiff had too much speed for the corner and lost control. The plaintiff’s son (who identified the wrong curve in discovery) claimed that the defendant was on the wrong side of the curve, causing his dad to make an unsuccessful emergency maneuver. The jury assessed 70% fault to the defendant and 30% to plaintiff.

The plaintiff, now 50-years-old, suffered a dislocated right knee with popliteal artery rupture which has left him with an unstable knee, and permanently damaged lower leg. Because of vascular damage he is not a candidate for knee reconstruction or replacement. The plaintiff’s treating doctors testified that he will require an above knee amputation within 20 years. Past lost wages were $78,000 and past medicals were $570,000. The jury awarded $7.5 million in general damages (3 m. past and 4.5 m. future) as well as all future economic damages asked for by the plaintiff. The jury deliberated for 3 and a half hours.

Settlement - $17,000,000

Data Breach

Infinity/Kemper Class Action Data Breach Settlement Attained by the Arnold Law Firm

The Arnold Law Firm, along with co-counsel at Morgan & Morgan, and Mason, Lietz, & Klinger, and Wolf, Haldenstein, Adler, Freeman, & Herz LLP, reached a settlement in the Kemper and Infinity data breach class action lawsuit, also known as Irma Carrera et al. v. Kemper Corporation and Infinity Insurance Company, filed in the United States District Court Northern District of Illinois, Case No. 1:20-cv-01883. The settlement is valued at over $17 million.

The Honorable Judge Martha M. Pacold granted Preliminary Approval of the settlement on October 27, 2021.

In addition to substantial injunctive relief, the class members will receive access to Aura’s Financial Shield Services for a period of 18 months, up to $10,000 for reimbursement of documented out-of-pocket losses reasonably traceable to the Data Breach, up to 3 hours of time spent remedying issues related to the breach at $18 per hour, and $50 for Class Members who are California residents.

History of the data breach: On April 8, 2021, the Arnold Law Firm and Wolf, Haldenstein, Adler, Freeman, & Herz LLP filed the first class action complaint against Kemper and Infinity in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois entitled Irma Carrera Aguallo et al. v. Kemper Corporation and Infinity Insurance Company, Case No. 1:21-cv-01883. The complaint asserted claims against Defendants for: (1) negligence; (2) negligence per se, (3) violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, et seq. – Unlawful Business Practices, (4) violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, et seq. – Unfair Business Practices, (5) violation of the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.100, et seq., (6) violation of California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 1750, et seq., (7) violation of Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, Florida Statute § 501.201, et seq., (8) breach of implied contract, (9) declaratory judgment, and (10) unjust enrichment arising from the data breach.

Settlement - $18,276,000

Qui Tam / Whistleblower

Whistleblowers Represented by Arnold Law Firm Expose Fraudulent Practices by the Pill Club, Case Settled With California DOJ

The Arnold Law Firm and the Hirst Law Group represented two whistleblowers who helped expose fraudulent practices by a start-up online pharmacy company called The Pill Club.

The company allegedly used fraudulent practices to bill California’s Medicaid program, Medi-Cal, for their services. The Pill Club is also alleged to have violated state laws by allowing nurse practitioners to prescribe contraceptive products to women without proper supervision or training from a licensed medical doctor.

For their part in blowing the whistle on the company they worked for, and as part of California Qui Tam laws, the whistleblowers and their attorneys recovered $4.9 million from the $18.275 million settlement paid to the California Department of Justice (DOJ) and the California Department of Insurance (CDI).

Settlement - $60,000,000

Data Breach

Morgan Stanley Class Action Data Breach Settlement Attained by the Arnold Law Firm

The Arnold Law Firm, along with co-counsel at Morgan & Morgan, Nussbaum Law Group, P.C. and others, reached a settlement in the Morgan Stanley data breach class action lawsuit, also known as In re Morgan Stanley Data Security Litigation, filed in the United States District Court Southern District of New York, Case No. 1:20-cv-05914-AT. The settlement resulted in a $60 million settlement fund to benefit class members.

The Motion for Preliminary Approval was filed on December 31, 2021 with the Honorable Judge Analisa Torres.

In addition to substantial injunctive relief, the 15 million class members will be provided access to Aura’s Financial Shield services for at least two years, which includes a $1 million insurance policy protecting each subscriber, credit monitoring, identity freezing, dark web monitoring, income tax protection and more services. The fund will also provide payments to people who submit valid claims for out-of-pocket expenses and/or up to four hours of lost-time incurred as a result of the data breach. Lost time allows victims of the data breach to be paid at $25 per hour for up to four hours of attested time spent dealing with the data breach. Out-of-pocket expenses can be claimed up to $10,000 if the costs or expenditures are fairly traceable to the data breach.

History of the data breach: On July 29, 2020, the Arnold Law Firm and Morgan & Morgan filed the first class action lawsuit against Morgan Stanley in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entitled Sylvia Tillman et al. v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC., Case No. 1:20-cv-05914. The complaint asserted claims against Defendants for: (1) negligence; (2) invasion of privacy; (3) negligence per se; (4) unjust enrichment; (5) violation of the California Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, et seq. – Unlawful Business Practices; and (6) violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, et seq. – Unfair Business Practices.

Settlement - $3,767,000

Truck Accident

A 20-year-old man who had been married for just 12 days left home on his way to work. He was driving on Pleasant Grove Road in Sutter County in the early morning when he came upon a slow-moving truck. As he pulled out to pass the truck, the truck driver turned left in front of him. The young man attempted to steer back into his lane but his vehicle struck an un-flagged piece of metal extending from the back of the truck. He died in the resulting crash.

Expert witnesses brought in by the Arnold Law Firm proved that the truck, owned and operated by a hauling firm, should never have been on the highway that morning. Specifically, the rear and side turn signals did not work and the rear-view mirror was in a poor state of adjustment at the time of the collision. As a result, the driver, who had failed to properly inspect the vehicle before setting out that morning, couldn’t see the young man’s vehicle as it attempted to pass.

The poor condition of the truck, its lack of maintenance and the manner in which it was operated were found to be substantial factors in causing the collision that killed the young man. The testimony also established that the man had been making a lawful pass at the lawful speed limit and acted reasonably when he attempted to avoid the collision.

The man’s 20-year-old widow was awarded $3,767,000.77, his parents were awarded $185,131 and the family was reimbursed $11,899 in funeral expenses. Though money is a poor substitute for a young man’s life, this verdict demonstrates that drivers who endanger the lives of others will be held accountable for their actions.