Arnold Law Firm Blog

Can My Employer Give Me Paid Time Off In Lieu of Overtime Wages?

Both federal and California law state that employees who work more than 40 hours in a week, or six days within a workweek, are entitled to receive overtime compensation. In some workplaces in California, that compensation may be overtime wages or compensatory time off. If you believe you are being denied overtime compensation by your employer, you should strongly consider speaking to our licensed Sacramento wage and hour lawyers today. The consultation is free, and there are no fees while we work on your claim. Below, we discuss some of the most common questions employees have about compensatory time off in lieu of overtime wages. Is Compensatory Time Off In Lieu of Overtime Wages Legal in California? This is a

Recovering Compensation for Accidents with Moving Trucks

California roads have been populated with a lot more moving trucks in recent times, significantly increasing the chances of collisions between these trucks and passenger vehicles. Crashes involving large box trucks, often used by movers, can be extremely dangerous due to their size and weight. Call our car crash lawyers in Sacramento today to learn more about your legal options if you were injured in a collision involving a moving truck. The consultation is free and there are no upfront fees. Below, we discuss the complex nature of moving truck accident claims and how we may be able to help. What Makes Moving Trucks Dangerous? Anyone with a valid driver’s license can rent a moving truck. They are not required

Elephant Insurance Data Breach

NOTICE: If you received a NOTICE OF DATA BREACH letter from Elephant Insurance, IT IS NOT A SCAM – it is a real data breach: contact the Arnold Law Firm at (916) 777-7777 to discuss your legal options, or submit a confidential Case Evaluation form here. Between March 26, 2022 and April 1, 2022, Elephant Insurance (“Elephant”) was hacked by a group of cybercriminals.  Elephant began notifying impacted people in May 2022, confirming that unauthorized third parties obtained access to Elephant’s systems and stole individuals’ names, driver’s license numbers and, for some, dates of birth. The individuals impacted by this are not necessarily Elephant customers. Your information was most likely taken by the cybercriminals by accessing Elephant’s online insurance quote

What to Know About Overtime Exemptions for Managers

When an employee has the word “manager” or “supervisor” in his or her title, the company he or she works for may try to make the person work longer hours without overtime pay. The company will likely use the excuse that as a manager the employee is exempt from overtime pay. However, this may not always be true. If you have reason to believe you are overtime-eligible and worked more than 40 hours in a week but did not receive one-and-a-half times your hourly rate of pay for those hours, you may be able to take legal action to recover unpaid overtime. Our wage and hour attorneys in Sacramento are prepared to confidentially review your claim during a free consultation.

Settlement - $3,767,000

Truck Accident

A 20-year-old man who had been married for just 12 days left home on his way to work. He was driving on Pleasant Grove Road in Sutter County in the early morning when he came upon a slow-moving truck. As he pulled out to pass the truck, the truck driver turned left in front of him. The young man attempted to steer back into his lane but his vehicle struck an un-flagged piece of metal extending from the back of the truck. He died in the resulting crash.

Expert witnesses brought in by the Arnold Law Firm proved that the truck, owned and operated by a hauling firm, should never have been on the highway that morning. Specifically, the rear and side turn signals did not work and the rear-view mirror was in a poor state of adjustment at the time of the collision. As a result, the driver, who had failed to properly inspect the vehicle before setting out that morning, couldn’t see the young man’s vehicle as it attempted to pass.

The poor condition of the truck, its lack of maintenance and the manner in which it was operated were found to be substantial factors in causing the collision that killed the young man. The testimony also established that the man had been making a lawful pass at the lawful speed limit and acted reasonably when he attempted to avoid the collision.

The man’s 20-year-old widow was awarded $3,767,000.77, his parents were awarded $185,131 and the family was reimbursed $11,899 in funeral expenses. Though money is a poor substitute for a young man’s life, this verdict demonstrates that drivers who endanger the lives of others will be held accountable for their actions.