Arnold Law Firm Blog

Can I File a Compensation Claim for a Low-Impact Collision?

Many car accidents can leave a lasting impact on the people involved, no matter how minor they may seem. That is why it is important to discuss your crash with a licensed attorney. Even low-impact crashes can cause significant injuries and you may be eligible to seek compensation for damages you suffer. The insurance company may try to deny or devalue your claim due to the nature of the accident, but our licensed Sacramento car accident lawyers are prepared to help you fight back and recover compensation for medical bills, pain and suffering, and other damages. Below, we discuss the dangers of low-impact collisions and the excuses often made by insurers who deny these types of claims. What is Considered

What Accommodations Are Employers Required to Provide for Breastfeeding Mothers?

Women who return to the workplace while still nursing are eligible for certain accommodations in the workplace under federal and state law, including having adequate space for pumping. If your workplace is not providing these accommodations, you may be able to file a claim against your employer. Let our experienced Sacramento hour and wage attorneys discuss your claim during a free consultation to see what legal options may be available to you. Call us today to schedule a free consultation. If you choose to work with us there are no fees while we work on your case. Reasonable Break Times for Pumping Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and California state law, employers are required to provide breastfeeding mothers

Health Net and TTEC Data Breach

NOTICE: If you are a California resident and you received a NOTICE OF DATA BREACH letter from Health Net and TTEC in December 2021, contact the Arnold Law Firm at (916) 777-7777 to discuss your legal options, or submit a confidential Case Evaluation form here. Between March 2021 and September 12, 2021, TTEC Services Corporation and TTEC Healthcare Solutions, Inc. (also called TTEC or T.T.E.C.) experienced a data breach where an unauthorized third party gained access to Health Net’s files on TTEC’s servers where sensitive personal information was stored. Health Net and TTEC waited until December 2021 to notify people that their information was accessed by unauthorized persons. Health Net used TTEC to call members and support Health Net’s operations.

Are Work-From-Home Employees Eligible For Overtime Pay?

As remote work becomes more prominent throughout the U.S., both employers and employees have been on a learning curve with employment law. For example, employers may have questions about overtime pay for remote employees. If you are a non-exempt, hourly employee, you have the right to be paid for every hour worked, whether those hours were in the office or in your home. Employers who withhold overtime pay to their employees could face serious legal consequences. Call our wage and hour attorneys in Sacramento today to discuss your legal options if you have been denied overtime compensation while working remotely. The consultation is free and there are no upfront fees. How Does Overtime Work For Remote Employees? Remote employees should

Settlement - $3,767,000

Truck Accident

A 20-year-old man who had been married for just 12 days left home on his way to work. He was driving on Pleasant Grove Road in Sutter County in the early morning when he came upon a slow-moving truck. As he pulled out to pass the truck, the truck driver turned left in front of him. The young man attempted to steer back into his lane but his vehicle struck an un-flagged piece of metal extending from the back of the truck. He died in the resulting crash.

Expert witnesses brought in by the Arnold Law Firm proved that the truck, owned and operated by a hauling firm, should never have been on the highway that morning. Specifically, the rear and side turn signals did not work and the rear-view mirror was in a poor state of adjustment at the time of the collision. As a result, the driver, who had failed to properly inspect the vehicle before setting out that morning, couldn’t see the young man’s vehicle as it attempted to pass.

The poor condition of the truck, its lack of maintenance and the manner in which it was operated were found to be substantial factors in causing the collision that killed the young man. The testimony also established that the man had been making a lawful pass at the lawful speed limit and acted reasonably when he attempted to avoid the collision.

The man’s 20-year-old widow was awarded $3,767,000.77, his parents were awarded $185,131 and the family was reimbursed $11,899 in funeral expenses. Though money is a poor substitute for a young man’s life, this verdict demonstrates that drivers who endanger the lives of others will be held accountable for their actions.