Arnold Law Firm Blog

Panera, LLC Data Breach

NOTICE: If you received a NOTICE OF DATA BREACH letter from Panera, LLC, contact the Arnold Law Firm at (916) 777-7777 to discuss your legal options, or submit a confidential Case Evaluation form here. On June 13, 2024, Panera, LLC (“Panera Bread”) reported a cybersecurity incident (“Data Breach”) to the Office of the Attorney General in both California and Maine. This public disclosure came after the company detected unauthorized access to its internal files on March 23, 2024. The breach itself occurred on February 9, 2024, but was only detected over a month later. A subsequent investigation concluded on May 16, 2024, confirmed that certain files containing employees’ full names and Social Security numbers had been compromised. On June 13,

Highway Hypnosis – Why It Is a Crash Risk and How To Avoid It

Have you ever been driving down the road and suddenly realized you could not remember the last few miles? If so, you have likely experienced highway hypnosis, a phenomenon that could quickly lead to a dangerous crash. Below, Arnold Law Firm explains more about highway hypnosis, including what it is and why it is a significant crash risk. We also discuss some of the steps you can take to avoid zoning out behind the wheel. Injured in a crash due to another driver’s negligence? If so, our experienced car crash lawyers in Sacramento are here to help you. Call our law offices anytime of day or night to take advantage of our FREE initial consultation and find out if you

Hip Pain After a Sacramento Crash – What You Need To Know

Getting knocked about in a car crash is almost certain to cause a lot of aches and pains. But if you have hip pain after a crash, you could have a severe injury. At Arnold Law Firm in Sacramento we encourage you to seek medical care right after the crash. Taking this step can help ensure you are treated for serious injuries without delay. Not sure if you have a case? Most people need legal help to determine their potential legal options. The good news is your initial case review is completely free. If we take your case on, there are also no upfront costs to pay. Request your FREE case review today. (916) 777-7777 Is Hip Pain After a

What Is the Reasonable Person Standard in a Sacramento Injury Case?

The reasonable person standard is a key legal concept used in personal injury claims. This concept is very useful to injured victims and their attorneys, who have the burden of proving the other party’s negligence. In complex personal injury cases, the reasonable person standard provides insight that helps juries and judges determine whether a defendant could have reasonably prevented harm to the victim. In this article, Arnold Law Firm explains what the reasonable person standard is in an injury claim. We also discuss how this legal tool helps provide clarity on whether negligence occurred. Were you injured by another party’s negligence in California? If so, we encourage you to contact our firm for a free case review. You may be

Settlement - $3,767,000

Truck Accident

A 20-year-old man who had been married for just 12 days left home on his way to work. He was driving on Pleasant Grove Road in Sutter County in the early morning when he came upon a slow-moving truck. As he pulled out to pass the truck, the truck driver turned left in front of him. The young man attempted to steer back into his lane but his vehicle struck an un-flagged piece of metal extending from the back of the truck. He died in the resulting crash.

Expert witnesses brought in by the Arnold Law Firm proved that the truck, owned and operated by a hauling firm, should never have been on the highway that morning. Specifically, the rear and side turn signals did not work and the rear-view mirror was in a poor state of adjustment at the time of the collision. As a result, the driver, who had failed to properly inspect the vehicle before setting out that morning, couldn’t see the young man’s vehicle as it attempted to pass.

The poor condition of the truck, its lack of maintenance and the manner in which it was operated were found to be substantial factors in causing the collision that killed the young man. The testimony also established that the man had been making a lawful pass at the lawful speed limit and acted reasonably when he attempted to avoid the collision.

The man’s 20-year-old widow was awarded $3,767,000.77, his parents were awarded $185,131 and the family was reimbursed $11,899 in funeral expenses. Though money is a poor substitute for a young man’s life, this verdict demonstrates that drivers who endanger the lives of others will be held accountable for their actions.