Arnold Law Firm Blog

Does Speeding Increase the Risk and Severity of a Sacramento Car Crash?

Many drivers speed without a second thought. They are either ignoring the risks or they do not know how dangerous it is to speed. Below, Arnold Law Firm’s experienced attorneys address the risks of speeding, including how it increases the risk of a crash and the risk of suffering severe injuries in a crash. We also review California laws on speeding. If you have been injured in a crash due to speeding or another form of driver negligence, call our firm today. Our experienced Sacramento car crash lawyers are here to assist you. An initial legal consultation is free and comes with no legal obligations. Schedule your FREE case review today. (916) 777-7777 Does Speeding Increase the Risk of a

Is Motorcycle Bias in California Crash Claims a Real Thing?

Motorcycle bias is a real thing, but many motorists are unaware of it or the impact it has on bikers. What may surprise you is that most crashes involving motorcycles and other vehicles are not caused by bikers. In today’s article, Arnold Law Firm discusses motorcycle bias and how it can prevent riders from being fairly compensated after a crash. Were you injured in a California motorcycle crash you did not cause? If so, you need experienced legal help on your side. Our trusted Sacramento motorcycle accident lawyers are strong advocates for victims injured by the negligence of others. During the four-plus decades we have been in business, our firm has recovered millions in compensation for our clients. These results

What Is Maximum Medical Improvement in a Sacramento Injury Claim?

Maximum medical improvement (MMI) is an important milestone for anyone who has been involved in a car accident, slip and fall or other type of injury accident. Below, Arnold Law Firm discuss the significance of MMI for injury victims, as this is the point when your lawyer can begin negotiating for compensation. MMI is also the point where doctors can tell you if you are likely to need ongoing treatment and for how long. Our experienced personal injury lawyers in Sacramento are here to help you through the legal process, advocating for the compensation and justice you deserve. Call our office today for answers to your questions about the legal process. Your initial consultation is free, and there are no

Consulting Radiologists, Ltd.

NOTICE: If you received a NOTICE OF DATA BREACH letter from Consulting Radiologists, Ltd., contact the Arnold Law Firm at (916) 777-7777 to discuss your legal options, or submit a confidential Case Evaluation form here. On June 14, 2024, Consulting Radiologists, Ltd. (“CRL”) reported a cybersecurity incident (“Data Breach”) to both Offices of the Attorney General in California and Maine. The breach itself occurred on February 12, 2024, during which an unauthorized third-party actor accessed certain files within CRL’s internal network. A subsequent investigation that concluded on April 17, 2024, identified individuals whose sensitive information was compromised. Since June 14, 2024, CRL has begun sending out data breach notification letters to those impacted by the incident. These notification letters offer

Settlement - $3,767,000

Truck Accident

A 20-year-old man who had been married for just 12 days left home on his way to work. He was driving on Pleasant Grove Road in Sutter County in the early morning when he came upon a slow-moving truck. As he pulled out to pass the truck, the truck driver turned left in front of him. The young man attempted to steer back into his lane but his vehicle struck an un-flagged piece of metal extending from the back of the truck. He died in the resulting crash.

Expert witnesses brought in by the Arnold Law Firm proved that the truck, owned and operated by a hauling firm, should never have been on the highway that morning. Specifically, the rear and side turn signals did not work and the rear-view mirror was in a poor state of adjustment at the time of the collision. As a result, the driver, who had failed to properly inspect the vehicle before setting out that morning, couldn’t see the young man’s vehicle as it attempted to pass.

The poor condition of the truck, its lack of maintenance and the manner in which it was operated were found to be substantial factors in causing the collision that killed the young man. The testimony also established that the man had been making a lawful pass at the lawful speed limit and acted reasonably when he attempted to avoid the collision.

The man’s 20-year-old widow was awarded $3,767,000.77, his parents were awarded $185,131 and the family was reimbursed $11,899 in funeral expenses. Though money is a poor substitute for a young man’s life, this verdict demonstrates that drivers who endanger the lives of others will be held accountable for their actions.