CALL 916-777-7777
Youtube Facebook-f X-twitter Linkedin-in

Sacramento Electric Scooter Accident Lawyer

FREE EVALUATION (916) 777-7777

Electric scooters are now a common sight throughout Sacramento, offering a quick and convenient way to get around. But as their popularity has grown, so have the number of accidents involving riders, pedestrians, and vehicles. These crashes often result in serious injuries, and many victims are left unsure of who’s responsible or how to pursue a claim.

At Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys, our Sacramento e-scooter accident lawyers are here to guide you through the legal process. We understand how complex these cases can be, especially when they involve rental companies, negligent drivers, or poorly maintained roads. Our team will work to uncover what happened, identify the liable parties, and pursue the full compensation you’re owed.

If you’ve been hurt in an electric scooter crash, don’t face it alone. Contact us today for a free consultation. You won’t owe us anything unless we win your case.

"*" indicates required fields

Address*
SMS*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

SETTLEMENT

$60,000,000

Data Breach

The Arnold Law Firm reached a settlement in the Morgan Stanley data breach class action lawsuit.

Learn More

SETTLEMENT

$18,276,000

Qui Tam / Whistleblower

A whistleblower case exposing fraudulent practices in the state of California resulted…
Learn More

SETTLEMENT

$17,000,000

Data Breach

The Arnold Law Firm reached a settlement in the Kemper and Infinity data breach…
Learn More

SETTLEMENT

$17,000,000

Data Breach

The Arnold Law Firm reached a settlement in the Kemper and Infinity data breach…
Learn More

SETTLEMENT

$8,000,000

Truck Accident

Late one spring afternoon, the Arnold Law Firm received a call from Angela, a young…
Learn More

JUDGEMENT

$3,900,000

Car Accident

The fatal collision between plaintiff’s Jeep Liberty and defendant’s Volvo truck…
Learn More

What Are Electric Scooters?

Electric scooters are small, battery-powered vehicles made for short rides. In Sacramento, you’ll see people using them to get across town, head to work, or just run errands. You can rent one through apps like Bird, Lime, or the service Uber used to run, called JUMP. They’re parked all over the city and easy to unlock with your phone.

As more people use them, safety concerns have grown. Some riders weave through traffic without helmets, and others hop on sidewalks where they shouldn’t. On top of that, the scooters themselves can be left damaged or poorly maintained.

While they offer convenience, they’ve also brought new types of accidents. Pedestrians, drivers, and riders are all at risk. If you’ve been hurt in a situation involving a scooter, a scooter injury lawyer in Sacramento can help figure out what went wrong—and who’s legally responsible.

What to Do After an Electric Scooter Crash

If you’re hurt in an electric scooter crash, what you do next matters. Here’s what we recommend:

  • Get checked out: Even if it feels minor, get medical attention. Some injuries don’t show up right away, and early records help later.
  • Take photos: Snap pictures of the scooter, where it happened, the road surface, your injuries, and any signs nearby.
  • Write things down: Note the time, the scooter brand (Bird, Lime, JUMP), and anything else that stands out.
  • Talk to witnesses: If someone saw it, get their name and contact info.
  • Stay quiet about blame: Don’t admit fault or say too much—especially to insurance.
  • Call a lawyer early: If you need e-scooter crash legal help in Sacramento, the sooner you reach out, the better.  An experienced lawyer can help preserve evidence and keep things from going sideways.

"*" indicates required fields

Address*
SMS*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Can You Sue an E-Scooter Company in California?

If you were hurt while using a rental scooter, you might be wondering if the company can be held legally responsible. The answer depends on what caused the crash and whether the company failed to take reasonable steps to prevent it.

  • The Waiver Isn’t Always the End: Most rental apps include a waiver, but that doesn’t mean the company is off the hook. If you’re hurt because the scooter malfunctioned, you may still have a case.
  • When the Company May Be Responsible: We’ve seen injuries from broken brakes, worn tires, sudden power cuts, and other problems that riders couldn’t prevent. If the company knew—or should have known—there was a safety issue and didn’t fix it, that’s where liability comes in.
  • How Product Liability Works: Under California law, manufacturers and rental companies have a duty to provide safe equipment. If they miss a maintenance check or ignore a known defect, they can be held accountable. This is where product liability laws apply.
  • Legal Help Focused on Scooter Cases: Whether it’s a Bird or Lime crash, you’ll want someone who understands these cases. A Bird scooter accident attorney or Lime scooter injury lawyer can dig into the cause and build your claim the right way.

Why Hire a Sacramento E-Scooter Injury Attorney?

Electric scooter accidents aren’t like regular car crashes. These cases often involve rental companies like Bird or Lime, and their user agreements can limit what victims can do on their own. On top of that, more than one person or company might be responsible. Maybe a car hit you. Maybe the scooter malfunctioned. Maybe the street itself wasn’t safe.

That’s where things get complicated—and fast. You’ll likely need to sort through insurance issues, figure out fault, and deal with companies that aren’t in a hurry to take responsibility. An experienced Sacramento electric scooter accident lawyer can help with all of it. They know what to look for and how to hold the right parties accountable.

At Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys, we understand how these cases work here in Sacramento because we’ve handled them. We know the rules, the scooter companies, and the local courts. If you’ve been hurt, we’re here to help you move forward and protect your right to full compensation.

WE FIGHT FOR YOUR MAXIMUM INJURY COMPENSATION

Free Case Evaluation
CALL 916-777-7777

Who Could Be Held Liable for an e-Scooter Accident?

Several parties may potentially hold liability for scooter accidents and the resulting injuries and damages:

E-Scooter Riders

If you were hit by an e-scooter as a pedestrian, the rider may be at fault for your injuries because of some form of negligence, which might include:

  • Speeding
  • Failing to brake in a timely manner
  • Not paying attention

Drivers

If you were hit by a motor vehicle while riding an e-scooter, the driver may be found at fault if he or she was not watching, was speeding, or was engaged in some other form of reckless driving. You may be able to pursue a claim against the driver’s car insurance policy.

E-Scooter Company

The company that made the e-scooter may be found at fault if the device malfunctioned during use and this led to your accident.

Pedestrian

If an e-scooter accident occurs as a result of a pedestrian acting in a negligent manner, such as walking while distracted, they may be at fault. You may be able to file a claim with his or her homeowner’s insurance.

City, Business or Construction Company

A city may be held legally responsible for accidents that occur because of potholes or damaged sidewalks. If a business or construction company is responsible for the property and the accident is caused by debris or obstructions on the property, the business or construction company may be held liable for the injuries.

How Terms of Service Agreements Could Affect a Claim

When you download an e-scooter ride share app, you may be asked to click to agree to various terms and conditions of using the app and riding an e-scooter.

Unfortunately, most people agree to terms and conditions without reading them. These terms may state that the rental provider will not be responsible for injuries to you or anyone you injure while using the device.

Your lawyer can review the agreement you signed and the circumstances of your injuries to determine whether the agreement prohibits you from pursuing compensation from the e-scooter company.

"*" indicates required fields

Address*
SMS*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Insurance Coverage for an E-Scooter Accident

There are a few types of insurance you may be able to file claims against after an e-scooter accident:

  • Auto insurance, if the at-fault party is the driver
  • Homeowners’ or renters’ insurance
  • Scooter insurance
  • Health insurance
  • Personal liability umbrella insurance

How Our Sacramento Attorneys Investigate Scooter Accidents

After an e-scooter crash, a strong case depends on what you can prove. That’s why our team takes a detailed, methodical approach to every investigation.

  • Gathering and Preserving Evidence: Our Sacramento e-scooter injury attorneys move quickly to secure evidence. We review photos and videos, request 911 call records, and preserve the damaged scooter itself if possible.
  • Analyzing Company Data: We look into the scooter company’s maintenance logs, rider app data, and geofencing history to check for software glitches or mechanical failures that may have played a role.
  • Working With Experts: When needed, we bring in accident reconstruction professionals. They help us understand the sequence of events and evaluate whether speed, design, or road conditions contributed to the crash.
  • Focusing on the Details: Every case is different, so we don’t cut corners. We take the time to build each claim carefully, making sure nothing important gets overlooked.

"*" indicates required fields

Address*
SMS*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

How Can I Get Compensation After an E-Scooter Accident in Sacramento?

If you were hurt in an electric scooter crash, you may be able to recover money for your losses. The key is understanding what compensation is available and how to pursue it.

Types of Damages You May Be Entitled To

Victims can typically seek compensation for:

  • Medical bills (emergency care, surgeries, rehab)
  • Lost income and future earning capacity
  • Pain and emotional distress
  • Property damage (like broken phones or gear)

Where Compensation Might Come From

Insurance coverage varies depending on the details. It may involve the scooter company’s policy, your health insurance, a negligent driver’s auto insurance, or a homeowner’s policy. Navigating these options requires skill.

California’s Comparative Negligence Rule

Even if you were partly at fault, you may still recover damages. However, your compensation is reduced based on your percentage of responsibility.

Why Legal Guidance Matters

An experienced Sacramento e-scooter injury attorney from Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys can identify every possible source of compensation. We handle the paperwork, deal with insurers, and build a strong case aimed at recovering the full amount you’re owed.

Why Choose Arnold Law Firm for Your Sacramento Scooter Injury Claim?

When you’re dealing with the aftermath of an electric scooter accident, having the right legal team matters. Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys brings over 50 years of experience helping injury victims across Sacramento recover what they’re owed. As a trusted Sacramento electric scooter accident lawyer, we understand the legal and logistical challenges these cases involve—and we know how to get results.

Our firm takes a client-first approach. You won’t be treated like just another case file. Instead, you’ll get direct attention from a dedicated attorney who’s committed to your recovery and well-being. We dig deep into the facts, investigate liability thoroughly, and handle every step of your claim so you can focus on healing.

There’s no upfront cost to hire us. We only get paid if you win. Schedule your free consultation today to discuss your scooter injury case.

Contact the Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys

If you or a loved one has been injured in an electric scooter accident in Sacramento, don’t wait to seek legal help. At Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys, we’ve spent decades fighting for injury victims throughout Northern California, and we’re ready to help you understand your rights and options.

Our experienced Sacramento e-scooter accident lawyers offer free, no-obligation consultations to evaluate your case. We work on a contingency fee basis—you pay nothing unless we secure compensation for your injuries, medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

Let us handle the legal details while you focus on recovery. Justice for e-scooter injury victims starts here.

Contact us today to get started. Call (916) 777-7777.

LATEST NEWS

Treble Damages in California Trucking Cases

justice4you January 30, 2026

California law provides a specific statutory remedy for victims injured by impaired commercial vehicle drivers when their employers fail to meet federal safety requirements. Understanding when treble damages apply—and how they differ from standard punitive damages—is crucial for truck accident victims seeking maximum compensation. What Are Treble Damages? Treble damages allow injured parties to recover three times their actual damages under specific legal circumstances. In California trucking cases, this remedy is narrowly defined and differs significantly from general punitive damages available in other personal injury cases. California Civil Code § 3333.7: Statutory Treble Damages Requirements for Recovery Under California Civil Code § 3333.7, injured parties may recover treble damages from a commercial motor vehicle driver’s employer when all of the

California Trucking Accidents: Standards of Care

justice4you January 29, 2026

California law establishes different standards of care for trucking operations depending on the type of service provided. While most commercial trucking companies transporting freight are subject to ordinary negligence standards, federal motor carrier safety regulations impose enhanced duties that can significantly affect liability in truck accident cases. Key Takeaways: Commercial carriers of goods generally DO NOT have the duty of “utmost care” Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) DO create heightened standards in specific situations Large truck drivers must exercise greater caution than ordinary motorists Licensed motor carriers have nondelegable safety duties Common Carrier Standard: When Does “Utmost Care” Apply? The Enhanced Duty for Passenger Transportation California Civil Code section 2100 requires carriers of persons for reward to use “the

Punitive Damages in California Personal Injury Cases

justice4you January 28, 2026

What Are Punitive Damages? Punitive damages are extra money a court can order a wrongdoer to pay, on top of the money that compensates an injured person for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. The main goal of punitive damages is not to repay the victim, but to punish especially bad behavior and to discourage similar conduct in the future. Think of punitive damages as a financial penalty for conduct that is much worse than ordinary carelessness. In California, punitive damages are not common. They are reserved for cases where the defendant’s conduct is particularly harmful, intentional, or shows a conscious disregard for the safety or rights of others. Most personal injury cases involve simple negligence (for example,

Settlement - $3,900,000

Car Accident

The fatal collision between plaintiff’s Jeep Liberty and defendant’s Volvo truck left Ryan Eisenbrandt’s surviving wife and parents with a judgment of $3.9 million, but the defendant’s insurance company refused to pay. This resulted in a second, intense legal battle between Plaintiffs and Defendant’s insurance company.

During the pendency of the wrongful death case, Defendant’s insurance company had filed a federal court action to rescind the defendants $1,000,000 insurance policy, claiming that defendant had made misrepresentations when applying for that policy. Initially, the federal court agreed with the insurance company, granting summary judgment that effectively denied recovery to the Eisenbrandts given the defendant was otherwise insolvent. The Arnold firm and the Eisenbrandts refused to accept this unfair outcome. They appealed the federal judge’s ruling to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Ninth Circuit reversed the lower court and sent the case back to the same federal judge for a trial on the merits.

Christine Doyle of the Arnold Firm tried the case in February 2011 in front of the same judge who had previously thrown out the Eisenbrandt’s case. A unanimous advisory jury and the trial judge, after hearing the true facts about the insurance company’s effort to avoid responsibility, found in the Eisenbrandts favor. After four years of fighting for what is right, the insurance company was ordered to pay up.

Settlement - $8,000,000

Truck Accident

Morgan Stanley Class Action Data Breach Settlement Attained by the Arnold Law Firm

Late one spring afternoon, the Arnold Law Firm received a call from Angela, a young mother of three. She was calling from the hospital where her husband Christopher had been air-lifted for treatment of severe injuries from a tragic motor vehicle accident earlier that day. Angela’s mother, a past client of our firm, had encouraged her to give us a call.

As it turns out, Angela’s prompt contact with us was a very important decision for their family. Immediate representation allowed our team to secure critical evidence right away — appropriate storage and analysis of the vehicle to avoid tampering, timely professional photography of the scene, and interviews of involved parties — which ended up being imperative to the details of Christopher’s case.

A commercial vehicle had failed to stop at a rural stop-sign intersection, colliding with the compact sedan driven by Christopher, an active 33-year-old father. The impact caused extensive damage to his spinal cord in the cervical area. Despite multiple surgeries, rehabilitation programs for physical and psychological therapy, and in-home care, his injuries rendered him a paraplegic, paralyzed from the mid-chest. In an instant, life as he had known it was gone forever.

At the time of the accident, the at-fault driver of the commercial vehicle was acting within the scope of his employment with a large corporation. With the employer being directly liable, as such, defense counsel fought hard to minimize Christopher’s damages, claiming that his being unemployed at that time devalued his losses. Our legal team made sure Christopher’s true losses were represented, including his potential income, his options and mobility, his ability to provide for and support his family, and the lifetime of care he now needed. Christopher’s injuries also dramatically affected his spouse’s daily life, resulting in a claim on her behalf.

Furthermore, the extent of Christopher’s injuries were, in part, due to defects involving the dual-restraint system in his own vehicle. Despite the manufacturer’s efforts to deny any responsibility, the Arnold Law Firm established negligence relevant to his case.

The result was a settlement of $8 million — the largest pre-trial settlement for this type of case in the region. Christopher now has the resources to receive the ongoing care he now requires, improve the quality of his life and take care of his young family.

Verdict - $10,200,000

Motorcycle Accident

The Arnold Law Firm is pleased to report that our attorneys received a $10.2 million verdict handed down in Modesto. Defense counsel was Kevin Cholakian of San Francisco. The defense rejected a 998 within the $1 million policy limits three years ago. The highest defense offer was $350k.

The case involved a blind corner dirt fire road collision between a truck driven by the defendant and a motorcycle driven by the plaintiff Dan Nixon. THe plaintiff had no recollection of the collision. The defendant claimed that the plaintiff had too much speed for the corner and lost control. The plaintiff’s son (who identified the wrong curve in discovery) claimed that the defendant was on the wrong side of the curve, causing his dad to make an unsuccessful emergency maneuver. The jury assessed 70% fault to the defendant and 30% to plaintiff.

The plaintiff, now 50-years-old, suffered a dislocated right knee with popliteal artery rupture which has left him with an unstable knee, and permanently damaged lower leg. Because of vascular damage he is not a candidate for knee reconstruction or replacement. The plaintiff’s treating doctors testified that he will require an above knee amputation within 20 years. Past lost wages were $78,000 and past medicals were $570,000. The jury awarded $7.5 million in general damages (3 m. past and 4.5 m. future) as well as all future economic damages asked for by the plaintiff. The jury deliberated for 3 and a half hours.

Settlement - $17,000,000

Data Breach

Infinity/Kemper Class Action Data Breach Settlement Attained by the Arnold Law Firm

The Arnold Law Firm, along with co-counsel at Morgan & Morgan, and Mason, Lietz, & Klinger, and Wolf, Haldenstein, Adler, Freeman, & Herz LLP, reached a settlement in the Kemper and Infinity data breach class action lawsuit, also known as Irma Carrera et al. v. Kemper Corporation and Infinity Insurance Company, filed in the United States District Court Northern District of Illinois, Case No. 1:20-cv-01883. The settlement is valued at over $17 million.

The Honorable Judge Martha M. Pacold granted Preliminary Approval of the settlement on October 27, 2021.

In addition to substantial injunctive relief, the class members will receive access to Aura’s Financial Shield Services for a period of 18 months, up to $10,000 for reimbursement of documented out-of-pocket losses reasonably traceable to the Data Breach, up to 3 hours of time spent remedying issues related to the breach at $18 per hour, and $50 for Class Members who are California residents.

History of the data breach: On April 8, 2021, the Arnold Law Firm and Wolf, Haldenstein, Adler, Freeman, & Herz LLP filed the first class action complaint against Kemper and Infinity in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois entitled Irma Carrera Aguallo et al. v. Kemper Corporation and Infinity Insurance Company, Case No. 1:21-cv-01883. The complaint asserted claims against Defendants for: (1) negligence; (2) negligence per se, (3) violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, et seq. – Unlawful Business Practices, (4) violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, et seq. – Unfair Business Practices, (5) violation of the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.100, et seq., (6) violation of California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 1750, et seq., (7) violation of Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, Florida Statute § 501.201, et seq., (8) breach of implied contract, (9) declaratory judgment, and (10) unjust enrichment arising from the data breach.

Settlement - $18,276,000

Qui Tam / Whistleblower

Whistleblowers Represented by Arnold Law Firm Expose Fraudulent Practices by the Pill Club, Case Settled With California DOJ

The Arnold Law Firm and the Hirst Law Group represented two whistleblowers who helped expose fraudulent practices by a start-up online pharmacy company called The Pill Club.

The company allegedly used fraudulent practices to bill California’s Medicaid program, Medi-Cal, for their services. The Pill Club is also alleged to have violated state laws by allowing nurse practitioners to prescribe contraceptive products to women without proper supervision or training from a licensed medical doctor.

For their part in blowing the whistle on the company they worked for, and as part of California Qui Tam laws, the whistleblowers and their attorneys recovered $4.9 million from the $18.275 million settlement paid to the California Department of Justice (DOJ) and the California Department of Insurance (CDI).

Settlement - $60,000,000

Data Breach

Morgan Stanley Class Action Data Breach Settlement Attained by the Arnold Law Firm

The Arnold Law Firm, along with co-counsel at Morgan & Morgan, Nussbaum Law Group, P.C. and others, reached a settlement in the Morgan Stanley data breach class action lawsuit, also known as In re Morgan Stanley Data Security Litigation, filed in the United States District Court Southern District of New York, Case No. 1:20-cv-05914-AT. The settlement resulted in a $60 million settlement fund to benefit class members.

The Motion for Preliminary Approval was filed on December 31, 2021 with the Honorable Judge Analisa Torres.

In addition to substantial injunctive relief, the 15 million class members will be provided access to Aura’s Financial Shield services for at least two years, which includes a $1 million insurance policy protecting each subscriber, credit monitoring, identity freezing, dark web monitoring, income tax protection and more services. The fund will also provide payments to people who submit valid claims for out-of-pocket expenses and/or up to four hours of lost-time incurred as a result of the data breach. Lost time allows victims of the data breach to be paid at $25 per hour for up to four hours of attested time spent dealing with the data breach. Out-of-pocket expenses can be claimed up to $10,000 if the costs or expenditures are fairly traceable to the data breach.

History of the data breach: On July 29, 2020, the Arnold Law Firm and Morgan & Morgan filed the first class action lawsuit against Morgan Stanley in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entitled Sylvia Tillman et al. v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC., Case No. 1:20-cv-05914. The complaint asserted claims against Defendants for: (1) negligence; (2) invasion of privacy; (3) negligence per se; (4) unjust enrichment; (5) violation of the California Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, et seq. – Unlawful Business Practices; and (6) violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, et seq. – Unfair Business Practices.

Settlement - $3,767,000

Truck Accident

A 20-year-old man who had been married for just 12 days left home on his way to work. He was driving on Pleasant Grove Road in Sutter County in the early morning when he came upon a slow-moving truck. As he pulled out to pass the truck, the truck driver turned left in front of him. The young man attempted to steer back into his lane but his vehicle struck an un-flagged piece of metal extending from the back of the truck. He died in the resulting crash.

Expert witnesses brought in by the Arnold Law Firm proved that the truck, owned and operated by a hauling firm, should never have been on the highway that morning. Specifically, the rear and side turn signals did not work and the rear-view mirror was in a poor state of adjustment at the time of the collision. As a result, the driver, who had failed to properly inspect the vehicle before setting out that morning, couldn’t see the young man’s vehicle as it attempted to pass.

The poor condition of the truck, its lack of maintenance and the manner in which it was operated were found to be substantial factors in causing the collision that killed the young man. The testimony also established that the man had been making a lawful pass at the lawful speed limit and acted reasonably when he attempted to avoid the collision.

The man’s 20-year-old widow was awarded $3,767,000.77, his parents were awarded $185,131 and the family was reimbursed $11,899 in funeral expenses. Though money is a poor substitute for a young man’s life, this verdict demonstrates that drivers who endanger the lives of others will be held accountable for their actions.