California Seatbelt Failure Accident Lawyer

FREE EVALUATION (916) 777-7777

Seatbelt failure accident lawyer Sacramento, CA

Across the country, auto accidents are the leading cause of death for people 5 to 34 years old. One in five drivers will be involved in some type of serious automotive collision in the next year. While seat belts are intended to prevent injury, and studies have proven that seat belts do save lives, sometimes a seat belt restraint can escalate injuries incurred in a crash. If you or a loved one has suffered a seat belt injury in a Sacramento car accident, call us today at (916) 777-7777.

Seat Belt Injury Facts

Seat belts are meant to protect passengers in the event of an accident. Studies have shown that seat belts reduce the risk of death by 45 percent in most cases. Nevertheless, seat belts have also been shown to cause injuries as well. With an auto accident injury occurring every 15 seconds and a traffic fatality occurring every 13 minutes, it is important to understand the potential risks associated with seat belts:
  • Lap seat belts are most commonly associated with injuries to the spine.
  • Improper use of a seat belt can increase the risk of injury as opposed to reducing injury.
  • The diagonal belt and the combination lap-and-diagonal belt can cause injuries to the ribs, sternum and upper abdomen.
  • In 30 percent of cases, skin abrasions to the neck, chest and abdomen indicate internal injury

Symptoms of Seat Belt Injuries

It can take several days for the symptoms of a seat belt injury to become apparent. The most common signs of seat belt injury include:
  • Abdomen pain – This includes pain between the hips and ribs.
  • Blood in urine and/or stool – This can be the indication of internal damage.
  • Trouble breathing – The pressure and force of impact can cause damage to the heart or lungs
  • Stiff neck – Commonly called whiplash, this type of injury is the most common seat belt injury. A stiff neck can also be an indicator of a spinal cord injury.
  • Weak legs – Weakness can indicate damage to the lower back, abdomen and/or spinal nerves.

Common Seat Belt Injuries

While seat belts are meant to restrain vehicle occupants in the event of an accident, they often contribute to damage incurred as a result of the crash. Common seat belt injuries include:

Who Is Liable for Seatbelt Failure Accidents? 

Injured woman after seatbelt failure accident in Sacramento, CAA seatbelt malfunction during a car accident can cause catastrophic outcomes and it remains essential to determine who carries the responsibility. Liability in these cases typically falls on one of two parties: the seatbelt manufacturer or the vehicle manufacturer.  First, let’s talk about seatbelt manufacturers. When a seatbelt has a manufacturing defect that prevents it from working properly, the company that produced it may be held legally responsible. Defects such as poor design or manufacturing mistakes indicate low-quality materials which make the manufacturer responsible for any injuries that occur. Then, there are vehicle manufacturers. Automobile manufacturers must verify that all safety features in their vehicles comply with stringent federal standards. Automakers who put faulty seatbelts or neglect to recall known faults face legal responsibility. Even if a seatbelt has no defects, improper installation or incorrect positioning can still make the automaker legally liable. Bottom line? A seatbelt that fails to protect during an accident represents possible negligence rather than mere misfortune. Finding which party is at fault is essential for obtaining deserved compensation. Our attorneys here at Arnold Law Firm have years of experience in helping injured clients pursue justice in the Sacramento area. Take a look at what our clients have to say about us to see why we are the most trusted personal injury lawyers in all of Sacramento, CA and beyond. If you were injured in a crash due to a defective or improperly installed seatbelt, Arnold Law Firm is here to help. Contact us today for a free consultation.

Steps to Take After a Seatbelt Failure Accident

Seatbelts are designed to save lives but their failure results in devastating consequences. After experiencing a crash where your seatbelt malfunctioned it is crucial to know the immediate steps to take.

1. Seek Immediate Medical Attention

Even if you feel fine, see a doctor right away. Some internal injuries may not show symptoms immediately. A medical evaluation not only ensures your safety but also creates vital documentation linking your injuries to the crash — an important piece of evidence in your case.

2. Preserve and Document Evidence

Take clear photographs of the damaged or defective seatbelt, especially if it ripped, unlatched, or failed to restrain you. If possible, do not move the vehicle until it’s examined by a professional. Keep all crash-related documents, including police reports and witness statements.

3. Contact a California Seatbelt Failure Accident Lawyer

Legal claims involving seatbelt failures are complex and require technical evaluation. A personal injury attorney with specific experience in product defects can investigate the seatbelt malfunction, gather evidence, and pursue a claim against the manufacturer or responsible parties. Establishing seatbelt failure demands technical evaluation along with expertise in product defects and legal tactics to take action against manufacturers. A qualified attorney will explore the defect thoroughly and collect the necessary evidence to secure your rightful compensation.

Common Injuries Caused by Seatbelt Failure 

During seatbelt failures, victims can sustain serious injuries that may exceed those from remaining unbelted. These accidents typically result in several injuries for their victims. A properly functioning seatbelt secures your body while a malfunctioning one allows your head to impact the dashboard or steering wheel. Injuries from seatbelt failure may cause concussions as well as skull fractures and permanent brain damage. Seatbelts exist to manage how your body moves during vehicle collisions. Failure of seatbelts during an accident exposes your neck and spine to powerful forces that can break your neck or injure your spine resulting in paralysis or permanent pain and restricted movement Also, a violent forward motion can cause your ribs to fracture, which then leads to critical damage to your lungs or other internal organs, such as the liver and kidneys. Internal bleeding poses a serious threat because warning signs might take time to develop. A defective seatbelt may cause uneven tightening or tearing which leads to deep cuts and burns, along with heavy bruising on the chest and abdomen. Safety features should function correctly but failure results in life-altering injuries. Filing a seatbelt failure lawsuit is likely your most effective option if you’ve experienced this situation.

Your Legal Rights After a Seatbelt Failure Accident in California

California’s product liability laws protect you when your seatbelt fails during a crash. Defective seatbelt injury claims usually require demonstrating only that the seatbelt was defective and caused injury because they operate under strict liability principles. The compensation you receive in California can decrease if you share blame for your injuries,  because the state operates under a comparative fault system. The defense could claim that your injuries worsened because you did not wear your seatbelt properly, but you retain the right to obtain damages even when you share some blame for the incident. You might receive compensation for medical expenses, lost income and pain and suffering as well as the costs related to an ongoing disability. Surviving family members have the option to pursue legal action if a seatbelt defect caused a wrongful death. These legal cases prove difficult as manufacturers have legal teams dedicated  to challenge claims. The expertise of a seasoned attorney plays a crucial role in achieving favorable outcomes in legal disputes.

California Product Liability Laws and Seatbelt Defects 

California offers powerful product liability protections which benefit individuals harmed by defective seatbelts. Strict liability allows you to show the seatbelt had defects which resulted in your injuries without needing to demonstrate manufacturer negligence. This Seatbelt failure lawsuit system in California allows injured parties to more easily pursue legal action against companies.

California recognizes three primary categories for defective product claims:

  • The seatbelt’s flawed design ensured its danger persisted even during proper use.
  • Although the seatbelt design was correct, production errors rendered it dangerous.
  • The manufacturer failed to provide adequate safety warnings and instructions about the seatbelt’s proper use.
California courts will review the defect itself alongside its role in your injuries and determine the manufacturer’s responsibility if you file a seatbelt injury lawsuit. These cases require expert testimony along with crash data and engineering analysis to establish the seatbelt’s defectiveness. Under California’s comparative fault system the defense might claim you were wearing your seatbelt improperly or that other factors led to your injuries but you remain entitled to compensation for seatbelt failure injuries. 

What Evidence Is Needed for a Seatbelt Failure Case?

A successful seatbelt failure claim requires more than simply stating the seatbelt malfunctioned because it demands concrete evidence The police report created after an accident records both injuries sustained and details regarding seatbelt usage and potential equipment failures. But an in-depth vehicle inspection is crucial. Accident reconstruction specialists and mechanics analyze seatbelts to identify signs of malfunctioning latches or retractor systems. Automotive safety experts and engineers validate a defective seatbelt by examining its design and materials while testing how it performs during crash simulations. The evaluation of your seatbelt failure against safety standards helps determine manufacturer fault. Injuries such as deep chest bruises caused by a malfunctioning belt lock mechanism or head trauma resulting from a belt that failed to restrain provide supporting evidence for your case. The connection between your injuries and the seatbelt malfunction becomes apparent through medical documents and accident scene photographs, which are valuable pieces of evidence. An experienced attorney can assist you in collecting the necessary evidence if you believe your injuries resulted from a seatbelt malfunction.

How Insurance Companies Handle Seatbelt Defect Claims

It requires significant effort to handle insurance claims following an accident involving seatbelt defects. Insurance companies focus on fighting large settlements and implementing every possible strategy to lower your compensation claim. When you submit an insurance claim you should prepare for immediate resistance. The adjusters could propose that your injuries resulted from reasons other than the seatbelt failure, they could claim you were speeding or that you failed to wear the seatbelt correctly. Their response strategy includes asking for numerous documents and delaying replies while searching for ways to decrease your compensation. Insurance companies aim to deny or reduce claims because they need to protect their financial interests. Because admission of seatbelt defectiveness by the insurance company would trigger extensive financial liability for them towards you and other claimants with identical issues.  Insurance companies might try to blame you by alleging you were going too fast or sitting improperly and claim other factors such as road conditions caused your injuries. This is why the importance of strong evidence which includes accident reports, expert testimony, and medical records cannot be overstated. If you lack critical evidence then the insurance company might try to reduce your compensation to as little as possible. An experienced lawyer will defend your rights when insurance companies refuse to be fair.

How Long Do You Have to File a Claim in California?

Seatbelt failure accident in Sacramento, CAFiling claims for seatbelt failure accidents requires prompt action to meet legal deadlines, because when you miss them, it can result in losing your compensation rights. The standard time limit for filing a personal injury lawsuit in California is two years from when the accident happened. The two-year time frame requirement for filing lawsuits applies when suing for defective seatbelt product liability cases. Certain circumstances exist that can either delay or lengthen the period allowed for filing. The statute of limitations will not begin until a minor reaches the age of 18. The deadline might be extended if the manufacturer was aware of the defect and deliberately concealed it. Also, victims who became physically or mentally incapacitated after their accident may receive additional time to submit their legal claims. Delays in taking legal action will likely ruin your chance to win your case. If you believe you have a claim then promptly contact the best seatbelt failure lawyer in California today. Consulting an experienced lawyer is the best step to avoid missing your compensation opportunity.

How a California Seatbelt Failure Lawyer Can Help

A seatbelt failure injury presents painful complications beyond physical discomfort. Since car manufacturers and insurance companies are not quick to settle claims it is essential to have an experienced lawyer who can change the outcome of your case. A lawyer will conduct a thorough investigation to determine the exact cause of the accident. The process entails examining accident reports and vehicle inspections while consulting experts to establish seatbelt malfunction. The goal? Your lawyer aims to prove through their case that the failure directly resulted in your injuries As we mentioned, insurance adjusters receive training to reduce claim payments by blaming victims and minimizing reported injuries. Your lawyer will manage all communications with the insurance company and defend against unfair lowball compensation offers to secure the full amount you deserve If negotiations fail to yield a fair settlement your lawyer will move forward with taking the case to court without hesitation. The legal team will provide strong proof and bring in expert witnesses to support your claim. A faulty seatbelt can transform your life instantly but you don’t need to face the legal process by yourself. A California seatbelt failure attorney ensures you receive both the justice and financial compensation you deserve.

Compensation Available in a Seatbelt Failure Lawsuit

You may receive substantial compensation if defective seatbelt design led to your injuries: The cost of medical treatments, including emergency room visits and surgeries,  combined with continuous physical therapy leads to rapidly increasing medical bills. You can use a lawsuit to obtain compensation for existing medical expenses as well as ongoing and anticipated future medical costs from your injury. If work absence resulted from your injuries you have the right to seek financial compensation for the income you lost. A permanent reduction in your work ability could entitle you to damages for diminished earning capacity. Physical pain represents only a portion of the total damage assessment in pain and suffering cases. Injuries from seatbelt failure can result in long-term emotional trauma and may lead to PTSD or anxiety. You are entitled to compensation for those non-economic damages as well. Courts often grant punitive damages when a manufacturer intentionally markets defective seatbelts. The purpose of these damages is both to penalize the company and to deter future similar negligent behavior.

What to Do After a Seatbelt Failure Accident

When a seatbelt fails during a car accident, rideshare accident or truck accident, a serious crash can quickly turn into a devastating, life-changing event. Taking quick action afterward is key to protecting your legal rights and building a strong case. It’s crucial to seek medical attention as soon as possible, because internal injuries and concussions might not reveal symptoms even if you feel alright. Also, it’s important to maintain the vehicle in its current condition without making repairs or disposing of it to preserve critical evidence. The defective seatbelt stands as one of the most powerful pieces of evidence supporting your legal case. Make sure to document the damage to the car and your injuries with photographs that capture any visible damage to the seatbelt. It’s important to acquire the police report, as that may hold essential information regarding the crash details and all involved parties. You are best off seeking legal help immediately, because seatbelt failure cases feature large corporations and insurance companies that will attempt to avoid settling claims. A lawyer can initiate immediate investigations while obtaining expert testimony and negotiating your rightful seatbelt injury compensation. Time is critical. The strength of your case improves when you take immediate action.

Why Choose Arnold Law Firm? 

After a seatbelt failure accident you’ll need a legal team equipped to take on big corporations and insurance companies and secure your victory. Arnold Law Firm demonstrates exceptional results in defective product cases by successfully holding negligent manufacturers accountable for their failure. Through many years of practice our attorneys have effectively managed difficult product liability cases to obtain substantial financial compensation for our injured clients. Our team collaborates with leading industry specialists to examine seatbelt defects while accurately reconstructing accidents to create robust legal cases that succeed in court. Our priority extends beyond victory to include your needs and peace of mind. We understand the severity of these injuries so we provide dedicated care and commitment to each case. We strive to obtain the highest possible compensation for your medical expenses and lost income while addressing your pain and suffering so you can concentrate on healing. Arnold Law Firm stands ready to take legal action on your behalf if your injuries were caused by a defective seatbelt. Our clients pay only if we secure a victory because justice should not cost you anything.

Contact a California Seatbelt Failure Accident Lawyer Today

Sacramento Lawyer Clay ArnoldSeatbelt defects can instantly alter your life, but Arnold Law Firm stands with you through the recovery process. We are ready to assist you in obtaining your deserved compensation for the injuries sustained because of a seatbelt malfunction. Our team of personal injury attorneys believe that if you have been injured by the actions or negligence of another driver, you deserve both compassion and compensation for your losses. Our team of attorneys has the knowledge and expertise necessary to successfully litigate a California car accident injury claim. There are no upfront costs and your initial case review is also free of charge. We also offer free case evaluations to anyone who believes that they may have cause to file an injury claim. During an evaluation, a member of our team of legal professionals will assess the merits of your claim and offer guidance on how to best pursue legal recourse for your losses. For more information on the legal rights which may be available to Sacramento auto accident victims and their families or to schedule a confidential, no-obligation consultation with one of our attorneys, please call (916) 777-7777.

"*" indicates required fields

Address*
SMS*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

WE FIGHT FOR YOUR MAXIMUM INJURY COMPENSATION

LATEST NEWS

Treble Damages in California Trucking Cases

California law provides a specific statutory remedy for victims injured by impaired commercial vehicle drivers when their employers fail to meet federal safety requirements. Understanding when treble damages apply—and how they differ from standard punitive damages—is crucial for truck accident victims seeking maximum compensation. What Are Treble Damages? Treble damages allow injured parties to recover three times their actual damages under specific legal circumstances. In California trucking cases, this remedy is narrowly defined and differs significantly from general punitive damages available in other personal injury cases. California Civil Code § 3333.7: Statutory Treble Damages Requirements for Recovery Under California Civil Code § 3333.7, injured parties may recover treble damages from a commercial motor vehicle driver’s employer when all of the

California Trucking Accidents: Standards of Care

California law establishes different standards of care for trucking operations depending on the type of service provided. While most commercial trucking companies transporting freight are subject to ordinary negligence standards, federal motor carrier safety regulations impose enhanced duties that can significantly affect liability in truck accident cases. Key Takeaways: Commercial carriers of goods generally DO NOT have the duty of “utmost care” Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) DO create heightened standards in specific situations Large truck drivers must exercise greater caution than ordinary motorists Licensed motor carriers have nondelegable safety duties Common Carrier Standard: When Does “Utmost Care” Apply? The Enhanced Duty for Passenger Transportation California Civil Code section 2100 requires carriers of persons for reward to use “the

Punitive Damages in California Personal Injury Cases

What Are Punitive Damages? Punitive damages are extra money a court can order a wrongdoer to pay, on top of the money that compensates an injured person for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. The main goal of punitive damages is not to repay the victim, but to punish especially bad behavior and to discourage similar conduct in the future. Think of punitive damages as a financial penalty for conduct that is much worse than ordinary carelessness. In California, punitive damages are not common. They are reserved for cases where the defendant’s conduct is particularly harmful, intentional, or shows a conscious disregard for the safety or rights of others. Most personal injury cases involve simple negligence (for example,

Settlement - $3,900,000

Car Accident

The fatal collision between plaintiff’s Jeep Liberty and defendant’s Volvo truck left Ryan Eisenbrandt’s surviving wife and parents with a judgment of $3.9 million, but the defendant’s insurance company refused to pay. This resulted in a second, intense legal battle between Plaintiffs and Defendant’s insurance company.

During the pendency of the wrongful death case, Defendant’s insurance company had filed a federal court action to rescind the defendants $1,000,000 insurance policy, claiming that defendant had made misrepresentations when applying for that policy. Initially, the federal court agreed with the insurance company, granting summary judgment that effectively denied recovery to the Eisenbrandts given the defendant was otherwise insolvent. The Arnold firm and the Eisenbrandts refused to accept this unfair outcome. They appealed the federal judge’s ruling to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Ninth Circuit reversed the lower court and sent the case back to the same federal judge for a trial on the merits.

Christine Doyle of the Arnold Firm tried the case in February 2011 in front of the same judge who had previously thrown out the Eisenbrandt’s case. A unanimous advisory jury and the trial judge, after hearing the true facts about the insurance company’s effort to avoid responsibility, found in the Eisenbrandts favor. After four years of fighting for what is right, the insurance company was ordered to pay up.

Settlement - $8,000,000

Truck Accident

Morgan Stanley Class Action Data Breach Settlement Attained by the Arnold Law Firm

Late one spring afternoon, the Arnold Law Firm received a call from Angela, a young mother of three. She was calling from the hospital where her husband Christopher had been air-lifted for treatment of severe injuries from a tragic motor vehicle accident earlier that day. Angela’s mother, a past client of our firm, had encouraged her to give us a call.

As it turns out, Angela’s prompt contact with us was a very important decision for their family. Immediate representation allowed our team to secure critical evidence right away — appropriate storage and analysis of the vehicle to avoid tampering, timely professional photography of the scene, and interviews of involved parties — which ended up being imperative to the details of Christopher’s case.

A commercial vehicle had failed to stop at a rural stop-sign intersection, colliding with the compact sedan driven by Christopher, an active 33-year-old father. The impact caused extensive damage to his spinal cord in the cervical area. Despite multiple surgeries, rehabilitation programs for physical and psychological therapy, and in-home care, his injuries rendered him a paraplegic, paralyzed from the mid-chest. In an instant, life as he had known it was gone forever.

At the time of the accident, the at-fault driver of the commercial vehicle was acting within the scope of his employment with a large corporation. With the employer being directly liable, as such, defense counsel fought hard to minimize Christopher’s damages, claiming that his being unemployed at that time devalued his losses. Our legal team made sure Christopher’s true losses were represented, including his potential income, his options and mobility, his ability to provide for and support his family, and the lifetime of care he now needed. Christopher’s injuries also dramatically affected his spouse’s daily life, resulting in a claim on her behalf.

Furthermore, the extent of Christopher’s injuries were, in part, due to defects involving the dual-restraint system in his own vehicle. Despite the manufacturer’s efforts to deny any responsibility, the Arnold Law Firm established negligence relevant to his case.

The result was a settlement of $8 million — the largest pre-trial settlement for this type of case in the region. Christopher now has the resources to receive the ongoing care he now requires, improve the quality of his life and take care of his young family.

Verdict - $10,200,000

Motorcycle Accident

The Arnold Law Firm is pleased to report that our attorneys received a $10.2 million verdict handed down in Modesto. Defense counsel was Kevin Cholakian of San Francisco. The defense rejected a 998 within the $1 million policy limits three years ago. The highest defense offer was $350k.

The case involved a blind corner dirt fire road collision between a truck driven by the defendant and a motorcycle driven by the plaintiff Dan Nixon. THe plaintiff had no recollection of the collision. The defendant claimed that the plaintiff had too much speed for the corner and lost control. The plaintiff’s son (who identified the wrong curve in discovery) claimed that the defendant was on the wrong side of the curve, causing his dad to make an unsuccessful emergency maneuver. The jury assessed 70% fault to the defendant and 30% to plaintiff.

The plaintiff, now 50-years-old, suffered a dislocated right knee with popliteal artery rupture which has left him with an unstable knee, and permanently damaged lower leg. Because of vascular damage he is not a candidate for knee reconstruction or replacement. The plaintiff’s treating doctors testified that he will require an above knee amputation within 20 years. Past lost wages were $78,000 and past medicals were $570,000. The jury awarded $7.5 million in general damages (3 m. past and 4.5 m. future) as well as all future economic damages asked for by the plaintiff. The jury deliberated for 3 and a half hours.

Settlement - $17,000,000

Data Breach

Infinity/Kemper Class Action Data Breach Settlement Attained by the Arnold Law Firm

The Arnold Law Firm, along with co-counsel at Morgan & Morgan, and Mason, Lietz, & Klinger, and Wolf, Haldenstein, Adler, Freeman, & Herz LLP, reached a settlement in the Kemper and Infinity data breach class action lawsuit, also known as Irma Carrera et al. v. Kemper Corporation and Infinity Insurance Company, filed in the United States District Court Northern District of Illinois, Case No. 1:20-cv-01883. The settlement is valued at over $17 million.

The Honorable Judge Martha M. Pacold granted Preliminary Approval of the settlement on October 27, 2021.

In addition to substantial injunctive relief, the class members will receive access to Aura’s Financial Shield Services for a period of 18 months, up to $10,000 for reimbursement of documented out-of-pocket losses reasonably traceable to the Data Breach, up to 3 hours of time spent remedying issues related to the breach at $18 per hour, and $50 for Class Members who are California residents.

History of the data breach: On April 8, 2021, the Arnold Law Firm and Wolf, Haldenstein, Adler, Freeman, & Herz LLP filed the first class action complaint against Kemper and Infinity in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois entitled Irma Carrera Aguallo et al. v. Kemper Corporation and Infinity Insurance Company, Case No. 1:21-cv-01883. The complaint asserted claims against Defendants for: (1) negligence; (2) negligence per se, (3) violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, et seq. – Unlawful Business Practices, (4) violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, et seq. – Unfair Business Practices, (5) violation of the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.100, et seq., (6) violation of California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 1750, et seq., (7) violation of Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, Florida Statute § 501.201, et seq., (8) breach of implied contract, (9) declaratory judgment, and (10) unjust enrichment arising from the data breach.

Settlement - $18,276,000

Qui Tam / Whistleblower

Whistleblowers Represented by Arnold Law Firm Expose Fraudulent Practices by the Pill Club, Case Settled With California DOJ

The Arnold Law Firm and the Hirst Law Group represented two whistleblowers who helped expose fraudulent practices by a start-up online pharmacy company called The Pill Club.

The company allegedly used fraudulent practices to bill California’s Medicaid program, Medi-Cal, for their services. The Pill Club is also alleged to have violated state laws by allowing nurse practitioners to prescribe contraceptive products to women without proper supervision or training from a licensed medical doctor.

For their part in blowing the whistle on the company they worked for, and as part of California Qui Tam laws, the whistleblowers and their attorneys recovered $4.9 million from the $18.275 million settlement paid to the California Department of Justice (DOJ) and the California Department of Insurance (CDI).

Settlement - $60,000,000

Data Breach

Morgan Stanley Class Action Data Breach Settlement Attained by the Arnold Law Firm

The Arnold Law Firm, along with co-counsel at Morgan & Morgan, Nussbaum Law Group, P.C. and others, reached a settlement in the Morgan Stanley data breach class action lawsuit, also known as In re Morgan Stanley Data Security Litigation, filed in the United States District Court Southern District of New York, Case No. 1:20-cv-05914-AT. The settlement resulted in a $60 million settlement fund to benefit class members.

The Motion for Preliminary Approval was filed on December 31, 2021 with the Honorable Judge Analisa Torres.

In addition to substantial injunctive relief, the 15 million class members will be provided access to Aura’s Financial Shield services for at least two years, which includes a $1 million insurance policy protecting each subscriber, credit monitoring, identity freezing, dark web monitoring, income tax protection and more services. The fund will also provide payments to people who submit valid claims for out-of-pocket expenses and/or up to four hours of lost-time incurred as a result of the data breach. Lost time allows victims of the data breach to be paid at $25 per hour for up to four hours of attested time spent dealing with the data breach. Out-of-pocket expenses can be claimed up to $10,000 if the costs or expenditures are fairly traceable to the data breach.

History of the data breach: On July 29, 2020, the Arnold Law Firm and Morgan & Morgan filed the first class action lawsuit against Morgan Stanley in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entitled Sylvia Tillman et al. v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC., Case No. 1:20-cv-05914. The complaint asserted claims against Defendants for: (1) negligence; (2) invasion of privacy; (3) negligence per se; (4) unjust enrichment; (5) violation of the California Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, et seq. – Unlawful Business Practices; and (6) violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, et seq. – Unfair Business Practices.

Settlement - $3,767,000

Truck Accident

A 20-year-old man who had been married for just 12 days left home on his way to work. He was driving on Pleasant Grove Road in Sutter County in the early morning when he came upon a slow-moving truck. As he pulled out to pass the truck, the truck driver turned left in front of him. The young man attempted to steer back into his lane but his vehicle struck an un-flagged piece of metal extending from the back of the truck. He died in the resulting crash.

Expert witnesses brought in by the Arnold Law Firm proved that the truck, owned and operated by a hauling firm, should never have been on the highway that morning. Specifically, the rear and side turn signals did not work and the rear-view mirror was in a poor state of adjustment at the time of the collision. As a result, the driver, who had failed to properly inspect the vehicle before setting out that morning, couldn’t see the young man’s vehicle as it attempted to pass.

The poor condition of the truck, its lack of maintenance and the manner in which it was operated were found to be substantial factors in causing the collision that killed the young man. The testimony also established that the man had been making a lawful pass at the lawful speed limit and acted reasonably when he attempted to avoid the collision.

The man’s 20-year-old widow was awarded $3,767,000.77, his parents were awarded $185,131 and the family was reimbursed $11,899 in funeral expenses. Though money is a poor substitute for a young man’s life, this verdict demonstrates that drivers who endanger the lives of others will be held accountable for their actions.