Posted on behalf of Arnold Law Firm
on November 4, 2022 in Auto Accident
Updated on April 29, 2025
Yes, jaywalking is legal in California as of 2025 under the Freedom to Walk Act. Signed into law on September 30, 2022, the Freedom to Walk Act effectively decriminalizes safe mid-block crossings, making it legal for pedestrians to jaywalk in many situations. The law officially went into effect on January 1, 2023.
This significant change impacts both drivers and pedestrians across the state. Understanding how the new law affects pedestrian rights and accident liability is crucial, especially if you are involved in a collision. With jaywalking now legalized under certain conditions, pedestrians may be less likely to be found partially at fault for a crash, potentially strengthening injury claims.
Below, our Sacramento accident attorneys break down how California’s updated jaywalking law could impact personal injury cases involving pedestrians. If you were injured in a pedestrian accident, we encourage you to contact Arnold Law Firm for a free consultation to discuss your legal options. There are no upfront fees, and we only get paid if we successfully recover compensation for you.
But what exactly is jaywalking, under California law, in the first place? Let’s take a closer look.
Jaywalking generally refers to crossing a street outside of a designated crosswalk or against traffic signals. In California, before the Freedom to Walk Act, pedestrians could be ticketed for crossing a road at any location other than a marked or unmarked crosswalk, especially if they disrupted the flow of traffic.
However, the definition of jaywalking often varies depending on local laws. Traditionally, jaywalking meant any crossing behavior that was not compliant with pedestrian signals or crosswalk markings. Enforcement focused on keeping pedestrians within crosswalks to reduce accidents and maintain traffic order.
Under the Freedom to Walk Act, jaywalking in California is now evaluated differently. Pedestrians are legally allowed to cross streets mid-block or outside of crosswalks as long as it is safe to do so and they do not create an immediate hazard for drivers. This shift prioritizes common sense and public safety over strict adherence to designated crossing points.
Understanding what jaywalking means — and how the law now views it — is important for both pedestrians and drivers navigating California’s busy streets. It also plays a crucial role in determining fault and liability if an accident occurs.
The Freedom to Walk Act states that pedestrians who cross the road outside of a designated crosswalk shall not receive a citation. Except when a reasonably careful person would realize there is an immediate danger of colliding with a motor vehicle or other human-operated device.
In short, while the Freedom to Walk Act gives pedestrians more freedom, it still requires them to exercise caution and good judgment when crossing the road. Safety remains the top priority.
While the Freedom to Walk Act gives pedestrians more freedom in choosing where they cross, it does not change California’s existing right-of-way rules. Drivers still maintain the right-of-way if a pedestrian crosses the road unsafely or steps into traffic without warning.
Pedestrians are still required to yield to oncoming traffic, and as a pedestrian, it’s important to avoid crossing the street when it could put you or others in danger. If your actions cause a driver to abruptly brake, swerve, or take a sudden turn to avoid a crash, as a pedestrian, you may be found at fault, and may be in danger of facing a citation for unsafe crossing.
In light of the new law, it is more important than ever for pedestrians to use good judgment. Even with added flexibility, crossing the road safely — and responsibly — remains critical for preventing accidents and protecting everyone on the road.
Yes, the new law does also impact how pedestrians interact with crosswalk signals at controlled intersections. Under the Freedom to Walk Act, as a pedestrian, you are allowed to cross at a controlled crosswalk even if the pedestrian signal is flashing “Don’t Walk,” as long as it is safe and does not pose an immediate threat to you or others.
However, safety remains the standard. If a pedestrian crosses when it is unsafe — for example, when vehicles are already approaching at a distance or speed that makes collision likely — they may still be ticketed for violating pedestrian laws. If you were jaywalking in an unsafe manner, you may be required to pay a citation of approximately $200, not covering the additional court fees.
Understanding these nuances can help pedestrians exercise their rights responsibly while staying safe on the roads in California.
A jaywalking pedestrian may be at least partially liable for an accident. The Freedom to Walk Act does not relieve pedestrians from their duty of due care for their own safety or the safety of others.
Therefore, if a pedestrian chooses to jaywalk when it is unsafe to do so, he or she may bear at least partial fault if a collision occurs. Drivers are still required to take reasonable action to prevent an accident.
However, if the pedestrian acted in such a reckless manner to walk out into traffic when it was clearly unsafe to do so, he or she may be fully liable for damages. For example, if he or she was distracted and failed to see oncoming vehicles.
The Freedom to Walk Act may offer some protection from liability for jaywalkers in some cases where it may not have in the past. For example, in the past pedestrians would be partially liable for their damages if they crossed the road outside a crosswalk, even if they were crossing when it was reasonably safe to do so. Under the new law, the insurance company may have a harder time placing blame on a jaywalking pedestrian who was injured by a negligent driver.
In California, fault in a pedestrian accident — even when jaywalking is involved — depends on the specific circumstances of the crash. Thanks to the Freedom to Walk Act, jaywalking itself is no longer automatically considered illegal if the pedestrian crosses safely. However, that does not mean pedestrians are free from responsibility.
If a pedestrian crosses the street in an unsafe manner — such as darting into traffic, crossing without checking for oncoming vehicles, or creating an immediate hazard — they could still be found partially or fully at fault for the accident. On the other hand, if the driver was speeding, distracted, or failed to yield, the driver may bear some or all of the responsibility.
California follows a comparative negligence rule, which means fault can be shared between the driver and the pedestrian. For example, if a pedestrian is found 30% at fault for crossing unsafely and the driver is 70% at fault for speeding, the pedestrian’s compensation would be reduced by their percentage of fault.
Determining liability after hitting a jaywalker can be complex. Insurance companies will carefully review police reports, witness statements, traffic camera footage, and other evidence to assign fault. If you are involved in a pedestrian accident, it’s important to speak with a qualified attorney to protect your rights and ensure liability is fairly assessed.
Yes, you may still be able to sue if you were jaywalking and got hit by a vehicle — especially under California’s updated pedestrian laws. The Freedom to Walk Act protects pedestrians who cross the street safely, even if they are outside of a designated crosswalk or against a traffic signal.
If you were exercising reasonable care when crossing — meaning you did not create an immediate hazard for oncoming traffic — you still have the right to pursue compensation for your injuries. Drivers have a duty to stay alert, avoid collisions when possible, and yield to pedestrians when it is safe to do so.
Several key factors may impact your ability to file a successful claim after a jaywalking accident:
Whether you crossed safely and cautiously: If you acted responsibly and crossed without creating an immediate hazard, you may have a strong case, even if you were outside of a designated crosswalk.
The driver’s behavior before the crash: A driver’s speed, attentiveness, and ability to avoid the collision will be closely examined. Evidence of distracted driving, speeding, or failure to yield could strengthen your claim.
Available evidence: Traffic camera footage, witness statements, police reports, and physical evidence from the scene can play a critical role in proving fault and supporting your case.
Because California follows comparative negligence laws, even if you share some fault, you may still be entitled to recover compensation. However, proving liability can be complex, especially when jaywalking is involved.
If you were injured while jaywalking, it is crucial to speak with an experienced pedestrian accident attorney. A lawyer can evaluate the specific circumstances of your case, gather the necessary evidence, and fight to protect your right to fair and full compensation.
Jaywalking accidents can involve motorcycles just as easily as cars. Since motorcycles are smaller and less visible, these crashes can sometimes be harder to untangle when it comes to fault.
If a pedestrian crosses unsafely and causes a motorcyclist to swerve or crash, the pedestrian may be held responsible. However, if the motorcyclist was speeding, weaving through traffic, or riding recklessly, they could share liability for the collision.
California’s comparative negligence law applies to these cases, meaning both the pedestrian’s and motorcyclist’s actions will be reviewed. Evidence like helmet cam footage, skid marks, and witness accounts often play an important role in determining fault.
California is an at-fault state, which means the person responsible for causing the accident is liable for the resulting damages. Whether you are a pedestrian injured by a negligent driver or a driver injured by a jaywalking pedestrian, you must typically file a claim with the at-fault party’s liability insurance to pursue compensation.
If you were injured while jaywalking, the driver’s insurance company may try to argue that you are to blame for the accident. However, California’s Freedom to Walk Act protects pedestrians who exercise reasonable care when crossing the road. If you crossed safely and did not create an immediate hazard, you should still be able to recover full compensation for your medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages.
On the other hand, if you are a driver who suffered injuries due to a pedestrian’s negligence, you may also have a valid claim. Your ability to recover compensation depends on the specific facts of the case, including whether the pedestrian acted unsafely and whether you took reasonable steps to avoid the collision. Pedestrians, like drivers, owe a duty of care to others on the road and can be held partially or fully responsible if they fail to cross safely.
Because California follows comparative negligence rules, even if both parties share some fault, you may still be entitled to partial compensation. Having an experienced pedestrian accident lawyer on your side can help protect your rights and ensure that fault is fairly assessed.
While the Freedom to Walk Act gives pedestrians more flexibility, jaywalking is still illegal in California when crossing the road puts themselves or others in immediate danger. The new law does not give pedestrians free rein to cross wherever and whenever they choose without regard for safety.
Under the Freedom to Walk Act, pedestrians can still be cited if:
They cross when approaching vehicles are close enough to pose an immediate threat.
They step into traffic without giving drivers enough time to slow down or stop safely.
Their actions force drivers to take sudden evasive maneuvers, such as swerving or slamming on the brakes.
In these situations, police officers still have the authority to issue a jaywalking citation, which can cost around $200, plus additional court fees.
It’s also important to understand that crosswalk rules remain in place at controlled intersections. Even though the new law allows some discretion, ignoring a “Don’t Walk” signal in a clearly unsafe moment — such as rushing across during heavy traffic — could still result in a ticket.
At its core, the Freedom to Walk Act was designed to protect common-sense, cautious crossings, not reckless behavior. Pedestrians are still expected to use good judgment and prioritize safety before stepping onto the road.
Yes, insurance can still cover a jaywalking accident in California, but it often depends on who is found at fault and to what degree. California follows an at-fault insurance system, meaning the driver’s insurance typically covers damages if the driver is primarily responsible for the accident — even if the pedestrian was jaywalking.
However, if the pedestrian is found partially or mostly at fault for causing the collision, their ability to recover compensation through the driver’s insurance could be reduced under California’s comparative negligence rules. In some cases, an injured pedestrian might need to file a claim through their own health insurance if liability is disputed or shared.
Pedestrians who cross the road carefully and responsibly — even outside of a crosswalk — are still protected under the Freedom to Walk Act, making it harder for insurance companies to deny legitimate claims simply because the pedestrian was jaywalking.
Navigating insurance after a pedestrian accident can quickly become complicated, especially if there is disagreement about who is to blame. Having an experienced attorney can make a big difference in protecting your rights and securing fair compensation.
If you are injured in a pedestrian accident, you may be entitled to recover a wide range of compensation to help you rebuild and move forward. In California, injury victims can pursue damages for both economic and non-economic losses. Common types of compensation include:
Pedestrian accidents often lead to significant medical costs. You may be entitled to recover compensation for ambulance rides, emergency room visits, surgeries, hospital stays, rehabilitation, physical therapy, medications, and follow-up doctor appointments. If your injuries require long-term care, future medical expenses related to the accident can also be factored into your settlement or court award.
If your injuries forced you to miss work — whether for days, weeks, or even longer — you can pursue compensation for the income you lost during your recovery period. In more serious cases, if your injuries limit your ability to work in the same capacity you did before the accident, you may also be entitled to damages for reduced earning capacity. This includes situations where you can no longer perform the same job duties or must switch to lower-paying work because of your injuries.
Not all injuries are visible. Compensation for pain and suffering is designed to address the physical pain, emotional distress, anxiety, depression, trauma, and diminished enjoyment of life you may experience after an accident. While these damages are harder to calculate than medical bills or lost wages, they are often a significant part of pedestrian accident claims — especially when injuries have long-term effects on your daily life.
If any of your personal belongings were damaged in the collision — such as a phone, backpack, bicycle, or other valuables — you may be able to recover the costs to repair or replace those items. Although property damage may seem minor compared to physical injuries, it is still an important part of your total claim.
In cases involving serious injuries, you might also be eligible for future medical costs and loss of enjoyment of life damages. Every case is different, and the amount you can recover depends heavily on the facts of the accident, the severity of your injuries, and the strength of the evidence supporting your claim.
Working with an experienced pedestrian accident lawyer can help ensure you are pursuing the full amount of compensation you deserve, not just what an insurance company initially offers.
If you were injured in a jaywalking accident in California, you may be wondering what your legal options are under the Freedom to Walk Act. Understanding your rights is critical, especially as the new law changes how fault may be determined after a pedestrian accident.
At Arnold Law Firm, our experienced California pedestrian accident lawyers are ready to guide you through the legal process. We can investigate the accident, gather critical evidence, and build a strong case to help you pursue maximum compensation for your injuries.
There are no upfront costs when you work with us. We only get paid if we successfully recover compensation on your behalf.
Call 916-777-7777 to schedule a free consultation today.
"*" indicates required fields
Mahul did a really good job. His been very helpful and was able to meet the client's need. His turn time was quick and very reliable. I am happy with the outcome. :) Happy client. I recommend Mahul and the team for the job well done.Jennifer Soto
I spoke to Stephanie regarding a possible case. It wasn't something they could take but she was very knowledgeable and helped send me in the right direction.Elaine Hawley
Truly great people. A great team and amazing effort. They moved very fast with my case and made sure I was alert every step of the way. They are also very welcoming and very comforting in hard times. I would strongly recommend this firm.Ajani_A E
I want to sing praise for Mrs Frances Siria @ Arnold Law Firm. She is an amazing asset to your company, very professional and such a pleasure to have worked with….. I can’t say enough about Mrs. Siria 😃 If I could give 6 ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ I would!Ryan Giboney
![]()
I love my Team Tony! Joy and Larisa are the absolute best! They've helped me emotionally and physically, and they were always there for me when I needed someone to talk to. They definitely walked me through my problems and helped me understand everything every step of the way. I would 100% recommend them!!! Tony has the best support that I could have ever asked for. They are kind, extremely knowledgeable, and approachable. I could not thank them enough! Please give them a try.
With personal injury cases, success is defined by more than the number of dollars awarded at settlement. Our clients come to us not just bearing physical and financial trauma, but emotional and situational scars, as well. As the legal process evolves, relationships are built with our clients that typically last for a lifetime. Sometimes, that […]
Learn MoreOn November 8, 2018, Anna* and her family fled their home in response to the Camp Fire mandatory evacuation. The massive fire destroyed more than 18,000 homes, displacing 50,000 residents in the town of Paradise, California, and surrounding areas. They didn’t have friends or relatives in neighboring cities to stay with and soon discovered that […]
Learn MoreOn a warm August evening, Ray G. and his family were driving home from a school sporting event. As his Ford F250 pickup traveled through an intersection on Washington Blvd in Roseville, California, a Toyota Corolla compact sedan ran the red light and slammed into the driver’s side of Ray’s truck. The driver of the […]
Learn MoreKimberly and Brian, both established professionals in Sacramento, were excited about moving into a charming yellow house in one of the best neighborhoods in the area. They had agreed to a lease-to-own arrangement that allocated $3,500 per month toward rent and an additional $2,000 per month toward a refundable deposit for the potential purchase of […]
Learn MoreMatthew B. contacted the Arnold Law Firm after consulting with multiple attorneys in the Sacramento area, including another major personal injury firm and an attorney specializing in motorcycle accidents. His case was rejected by other attorneys due to complexity with liability. As the rider in a car vs. motorcycle collision, Matthew suffered significant injuries to […]
Learn MoreMr. E was on his way to work one very ordinary fall morning when an inattentive driver ran a red light, collided with his vehicle, and changed his life forever. In that moment, although he didn’t realize it at the time, a chain of events was set into motion that affected every aspect of his […]
Learn More