Arnold Law Firm Blog

Sequoia Benefits & Insurance Services, LLC Data Breach

NOTICE: If you received a NOTICE OF DATA BREACH letter from Sequoia Benefits & Insurance Services, contact the Arnold Law Firm at 916-777-7777 to discuss your legal options, or submit a confidential Case Evaluation form here. On or about December 7, 2022, Sequoia Benefits & Insurance Services, LLC (“Sequoia”) sent a Notice of Data Breach Letter (“Breach Letter”) to its customers, corporate, and individuals, informing them that their personally identifiable information (“PII”) was exposed through an “unauthorized party” that “may have accessed a cloud storage system” (“data breach”). According to the Breach Letter, hackers first gained access to Sequoia’s systems between September 22, 2022 and October 6, 2022. The PII stolen by the hackers included, but was not limited to,

Veros Credit Data Breach

NOTICE: If you received a NOTICE OF DATA BREACH letter from Veros Credit, contact the Arnold Law Firm at (916) 777-7777 to discuss your legal options, or submit a confidential Case Evaluation form here. On or about December 5, 2022, Veros Credit (“Veros”) sent a Notice of Data Breach Letter (“Breach Letter”) to individuals informing them their personally identifiable information (“PII”) was exposed through a ransomware attack perpetrated by cyberthieves/hackers (“data breach”). According to the Breach Letter, hackers first gained access to Veros’s systems on December 10, 2021. The PII stolen by the hackers consisted of, including, but not limited to, Social Security numbers, driver’s license or state identification numbers, financial account numbers or debit/credit card numbers (in combination with

Can a Passenger File a Claim Against More Than One At-Fault Driver After an Accident?

If you were injured in an accident as a passenger, you have the right to pursue compensation for your damages. You may be able to file a claim against more than one driver if there are multiple parties at fault for the collision. For example, you may have a claim against the driver of the car you were in, and the drivers of other vehicles involved in the collision. Below, we discuss the circumstances when a passenger may be able to file a claim with multiple drivers. Call our Sacramento car accident lawyers today to discuss your claim if you were injured in a crash caused by another driver’s negligence. We offer a free consultation, and there are no upfront

Snap Finance LLC and Snap RTO LLC Data Breach

NOTICE: If you received a NOTICE OF DATA BREACH letter from Snap Finance LLC, Snap RTO LLC, or both, contact the Arnold Law Firm at 916-777-7777 to discuss your legal options, or submit a confidential Case Evaluation form here. On or about December 2, 2022, Snap Finance LLC and Snap RTO LLC (“Snap”) sent a (“Breach Letter”) to individuals informing them their personally identifiable information (“PII”) had been exfiltrated from Snap’s computer system through an external attack or “hacking” perpetrated by cyberthieves/hackers (“data breach”). According to the Breach Letter, hackers gained “unauthorized access” (hacked) into Snap’s computer system between June 23, 2022 and September 8, 2022. Snap claims it took their “third-party forensics specialists” until October 28, 2022 to determine

Settlement - $3,767,000

Truck Accident

A 20-year-old man who had been married for just 12 days left home on his way to work. He was driving on Pleasant Grove Road in Sutter County in the early morning when he came upon a slow-moving truck. As he pulled out to pass the truck, the truck driver turned left in front of him. The young man attempted to steer back into his lane but his vehicle struck an un-flagged piece of metal extending from the back of the truck. He died in the resulting crash.

Expert witnesses brought in by the Arnold Law Firm proved that the truck, owned and operated by a hauling firm, should never have been on the highway that morning. Specifically, the rear and side turn signals did not work and the rear-view mirror was in a poor state of adjustment at the time of the collision. As a result, the driver, who had failed to properly inspect the vehicle before setting out that morning, couldn’t see the young man’s vehicle as it attempted to pass.

The poor condition of the truck, its lack of maintenance and the manner in which it was operated were found to be substantial factors in causing the collision that killed the young man. The testimony also established that the man had been making a lawful pass at the lawful speed limit and acted reasonably when he attempted to avoid the collision.

The man’s 20-year-old widow was awarded $3,767,000.77, his parents were awarded $185,131 and the family was reimbursed $11,899 in funeral expenses. Though money is a poor substitute for a young man’s life, this verdict demonstrates that drivers who endanger the lives of others will be held accountable for their actions.