Arnold Law Firm Blog

What You Should Know Before Talking to the Insurance Company After a Motorcycle Crash

After a motorcycle accident, you must file an insurance claim to pursue compensation for your damages. Before you call the insurance company, you should remember that they are not on your side. The insurance company is looking to pay out as little for your claim as possible. That is if they do not blame you for the accident and deny your claim. If you need help filing an insurance claim, call our motorcycle accident lawyers in Sacramento today. The consultation is free and there are no upfront fees. Below, we discuss what you should know before you talk to the insurance company after a motorcycle crash. You Do Not Need to Provide a Recorded Statement The insurance company will most

Is a Property Owner Liable for Accidents on a Sidewalk in California?

If there is a structural hazard on a sidewalk and you fall, the owner of the property where the sidewalk is may be financially responsible for your injuries in some parts of California. The laws pertaining to property owner liability for sidewalk accidents can be complex. Below, we discuss how state and local ordinances may affect your legal options if you are injured in a sidewalk slip and fall accident. However, every case is different. Call our Sacramento slip and fall lawyers to discuss your claim during a free legal consultation. If you choose to work with us, there are no upfront fees for our services. What Does California Law Say About Property Owner Liability? Property owners in California have

What You Should Know About Recent Eye Drop Recalls

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a recall of several eye drop brands. The announcement from the health regulator comes after a voluntary recall in February from the manufacturer of an eyedrop brand produced in India that caused serious health issues for several individuals. Two more brands are included in the latest recall due to concerns about the sterility of the product. If you were affected by these defective eye drops, call our defective products lawyers in Sacramento today. We offer a free consultation to determine your legal options. We also do not charge you anything while we work on your case. What Eye Drops Were Recalled? In February 2023, the FDA issued a statement notifying the public

How Does Negligence Per Se Affect an Accident Claim?

When filing a claim after an accident, the victim must prove his or her damages were the direct result of another party’s negligence. In most accident cases, the injured party must prove ordinary negligence. However, there is also the doctrine of negligence per se. Negligence per se is when someone violates a law, and in doing so, causes injuries to another person. If you were injured by someone who broke a law, you have the right to pursue compensation for your damages. Call our Sacramento car crash lawyers today to discuss your claim. Below, we discuss how negligence per se may affect the way an accident claim is handled. What Are the Elements of Negligence Per Se? To prove someone

Settlement - $3,767,000

Truck Accident

A 20-year-old man who had been married for just 12 days left home on his way to work. He was driving on Pleasant Grove Road in Sutter County in the early morning when he came upon a slow-moving truck. As he pulled out to pass the truck, the truck driver turned left in front of him. The young man attempted to steer back into his lane but his vehicle struck an un-flagged piece of metal extending from the back of the truck. He died in the resulting crash.

Expert witnesses brought in by the Arnold Law Firm proved that the truck, owned and operated by a hauling firm, should never have been on the highway that morning. Specifically, the rear and side turn signals did not work and the rear-view mirror was in a poor state of adjustment at the time of the collision. As a result, the driver, who had failed to properly inspect the vehicle before setting out that morning, couldn’t see the young man’s vehicle as it attempted to pass.

The poor condition of the truck, its lack of maintenance and the manner in which it was operated were found to be substantial factors in causing the collision that killed the young man. The testimony also established that the man had been making a lawful pass at the lawful speed limit and acted reasonably when he attempted to avoid the collision.

The man’s 20-year-old widow was awarded $3,767,000.77, his parents were awarded $185,131 and the family was reimbursed $11,899 in funeral expenses. Though money is a poor substitute for a young man’s life, this verdict demonstrates that drivers who endanger the lives of others will be held accountable for their actions.