Arnold Law Firm Blog

SOUTH SUBURBAN COLLEGE DATA BREACH

NOTICE: If you received a NOTICE OF DATA BREACH letter from South Suburban College, contact the Arnold Law Firm at (916) 777-7777 to discuss your legal options or submit a confidential Case Evaluation form here. On or about August 5, 2024, South Suburban College (“SSC”) sent a Notice of Data Breach Letter (“Breach Letter”) via mail to victims of the SSC data breach, informing them that their personal information and Personally Identifiable Information (“PII”), was obtained by an unauthorized actor who accessed SSC’s network (“data breach”). After SSC became aware of the potential unauthorized access to its network on November 8, 2023, it launched an investigation. The investigation determined that an unauthorized user had potentially infiltrated SSC’s network and attempted

EVENING POST PUBLISHING, INC. DATA BREACH

NOTICE: If you received a NOTICE OF DATA BREACH letter from Evening Post Publishing, Inc. contact the Arnold Law Firm at (916) 777-7777 to discuss your legal options, or submit a confidential Case Evaluation form here. On or about July 8, 2024, Evening Post Publishing, Inc. (“Evening Post”) sent a Notice of Data Breach Letter (“Breach Letter”) via mail to victims of the Evening Post data breach, informing them that their personal information and Personally Identifiable Information (“PII”), was obtained by an unauthorized actor who accessed Evening Post’s network (“data breach”) between March 13 and March 20, 2024. After Evening Post became aware of the potential unauthorized access to its network on March 20, 2024, it launched an investigation. The

EAST VALLEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DATA BREACH

NOTICE: If you received a NOTICE OF DATA BREACH letter from East Valley Institute of Technology, contact the Arnold Law Firm at (916) 777-7777 to discuss your legal options or submit a confidential Case Evaluation. On August 9, 2024, the East Valley Institute of Technology (“EVIT”) reported a cybersecurity incident (“Data Breach”) to the Office of the Attorney General in Maine. The Data Breach, first detected on January 9, 2024, involved unauthorized access to EVIT’s internal network. EVIT has initiated the process of sending notifications to the impacted individuals, both via email and mail. These notifications include an offer for a one-year complimentary membership to a credit monitoring service. To date, it’s reported that approximately 208,717 individuals have been affected,

Can Cellphone Records Prove Distracted Driving in Sacramento?

Distracted driving is one of the leading causes of serious and fatal crashes in Sacramento, throughout the state and across the country. Yet people still seem unable to put their phones down, even to protect themselves and their loved ones. Below, our experienced Sacramento car crash attorneys at Arnold Law Firm discuss distracted driving crashes resulting from cellphone use. We also explain how accessing these driver’s cellphone records can help to prove your case. Need legal help after being injured by a distracted driver? Our trusted law firm has been helping victims injured by the negligence of others for decades. Find out if you may have a case. There is no cost for this meeting, so no risk to you.

Settlement - $3,767,000

Truck Accident

A 20-year-old man who had been married for just 12 days left home on his way to work. He was driving on Pleasant Grove Road in Sutter County in the early morning when he came upon a slow-moving truck. As he pulled out to pass the truck, the truck driver turned left in front of him. The young man attempted to steer back into his lane but his vehicle struck an un-flagged piece of metal extending from the back of the truck. He died in the resulting crash.

Expert witnesses brought in by the Arnold Law Firm proved that the truck, owned and operated by a hauling firm, should never have been on the highway that morning. Specifically, the rear and side turn signals did not work and the rear-view mirror was in a poor state of adjustment at the time of the collision. As a result, the driver, who had failed to properly inspect the vehicle before setting out that morning, couldn’t see the young man’s vehicle as it attempted to pass.

The poor condition of the truck, its lack of maintenance and the manner in which it was operated were found to be substantial factors in causing the collision that killed the young man. The testimony also established that the man had been making a lawful pass at the lawful speed limit and acted reasonably when he attempted to avoid the collision.

The man’s 20-year-old widow was awarded $3,767,000.77, his parents were awarded $185,131 and the family was reimbursed $11,899 in funeral expenses. Though money is a poor substitute for a young man’s life, this verdict demonstrates that drivers who endanger the lives of others will be held accountable for their actions.