Posted on behalf of Arnold Law Firm
on July 2, 2021 in Personal Injury
Updated on February 24, 2022
When you live vicariously through someone else’s life, it usually means you are taking pleasure in another person’s adventures and other exploits. Vicarious liability is similar in that another party may be held financially liable for another person’s actions.
Vicarious liability could include suffering an injury due to the negligent actions of someone who was driving another person’s car or you fell in a store because an employee acted negligently, you may be able to recover compensation from the party that is vicariously liable for the negligence of the person who caused you harm.
Call our Sacramento personal injury attorneys today for a free consultation to discuss your claim. We do not charge you anything upfront or while we work on your claim.
Generally, a person is responsible for his or her own actions, including negligent acts. However, under the legal principle of vicarious liability, a party not directly involved in someone else’s negligent actions may be held financially liable so long as there is some type of connected relationship. Vicarious liability is based on the following two legal principles.
Latin for “He who acts through another does the act himself.”
This term means that when someone authorizes another to perform a task or knowingly lets someone borrow something does so knowing he or she would be held vicariously liable for negligent actions that result in damages to a third party.
Latin for “Let the master answer.”
This term means a superior is responsible for the actions of his or her subordinates. An example would be an employer being held financially liable for the actions of an employee.
For an employer to be held liable for the actions of an employee, the negligent act must have occurred in the course of employment, which was authorized, directed by, or otherwise connected to the employer.
To prove an employer’s vicarious liability, the injured party must prove:
When defining the scope of employment, it generally means the actions of an employee occurred within the terms of his or her job description. However, the definition may vary depending on specific requirements for the position and type of employment.
For example, if a delivery, while delivering for a warehouse, crashes into you and you suffer an injury, the company that employs the driver may be held vicariously liable for your injuries because that driver was acting within their scope of employment when driving the company vehicle to make that delivery.
It may become even more complicated in cases involving an independent contractor, such as a rideshare driver who crashes into you. It would be in your best interest to work with our knowledgeable attorneys who understand employer vicarious liability.
Under the common law of vicarious liability, vehicle owners are generally not held financially liable for a negligent driver who crashes his or her vehicle into someone else, causing injuries and other damages.
However, under California’s permissive use statute, if a vehicle owner knowingly entrusts his or her vehicle to an individual whose negligent actions result in a third party’s damages, the vehicle owner may be held financially liable.
In California, parents of minor children may be held liable for any willful acts of their child, resulting in injuries and other damages, so long as the parent or guardian has custody and control over the child. There is a cap of $25,000 on damages, except in cases involving a teen driver who causes a motor vehicle accident.
There is usually no cap in these instances, and the parents’ motor vehicle insurance generally pays the damages.
Filing a claim in which a party may be vicariously liable for your injuries can be complex to handle on your own, as there may be several other factors to consider.
Fortunately, our attorneys have decades of experience handling a variety of claims and helping injury victims in California recover the compensation they need for medical bills, lost wages, and other damages. The consultation is free, and there are no fees unless we win.
Call the Arnold Law Firm today at (916) 777-7777
"*" indicates required fields
Mahul did a really good job. His been very helpful and was able to meet the client's need. His turn time was quick and very reliable. I am happy with the outcome. :) Happy client. I recommend Mahul and the team for the job well done.Jennifer Soto
I spoke to Stephanie regarding a possible case. It wasn't something they could take but she was very knowledgeable and helped send me in the right direction.Elaine Hawley
Truly great people. A great team and amazing effort. They moved very fast with my case and made sure I was alert every step of the way. They are also very welcoming and very comforting in hard times. I would strongly recommend this firm.Ajani_A E
I want to sing praise for Mrs Frances Siria @ Arnold Law Firm. She is an amazing asset to your company, very professional and such a pleasure to have worked with….. I can’t say enough about Mrs. Siria 😃 If I could give 6 ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ I would!Ryan Giboney
![]()
I love my Team Tony! Joy and Larisa are the absolute best! They've helped me emotionally and physically, and they were always there for me when I needed someone to talk to. They definitely walked me through my problems and helped me understand everything every step of the way. I would 100% recommend them!!! Tony has the best support that I could have ever asked for. They are kind, extremely knowledgeable, and approachable. I could not thank them enough! Please give them a try.
The Arnold Law Firm reached a settlement in the Morgan Stanley data breach class action lawsuit. The settlement resulted in a $60 million settlement fund to benefit class members.
Learn MoreA whistleblower case exposing fraudulent practices in the state of California resulted in an $18.275 million settlement.
Learn MoreThe Arnold Law Firm reached a settlement in the Kemper and Infinity data breach class action lawsuit. The settlement is valued at over $17 million.
Learn MoreThe Arnold Law Firm is pleased to report that our attorneys received a $10.2 million verdict handed down in Modesto. Defense counsel was Kevin Cholakian of San Francisco. The defense rejected a 998 within the $1 million policy limits three years ago. The highest defense offer was $350k. The case involved a blind corner dirt […]
Learn MoreLate one spring afternoon, the Arnold Law Firm received a call from Angela, a young mother of three. She was calling from the hospital where her husband Christopher had been air-lifted for treatment of severe injuries from a tragic motor vehicle accident earlier that day. Angela’s mother, a past client of our firm, had encouraged […]
Learn MoreThe fatal collision between plaintiff’s Jeep Liberty and defendant’s Volvo truck left Ryan Eisenbrandt’s surviving wife and parents with a judgment of $3.9 million, but the defendant’s insurance company refused to pay. This resulted in a second, intense legal battle between Plaintiffs and Defendant’s insurance company. During the pendency of the wrongful death case, Defendant’s […]
Learn More