Sacramento Hit and Run Attorney

FREE EVALUATION (916) 777-7777

Trusted Hit and Run Accident Lawyer in Sacramento

When you’re faced with the aftermath of a hit-and-run accident, having a reliable advocate can make all the difference. At Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys, our dedicated team of legal professionals has a long-standing commitment to helping Sacramento hit and run accident victims secure the justice and compensation they deserve.

Our extensive experience and proven track record speak for themselves. We’ve successfully handled numerous hit-and-run cases, recovering damages for medical expenses, lost wages, and emotional suffering. Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys is known for providing compassionate, client-focused representation tailored to each case’s unique needs.

Clients consistently commend our personalized approach and unwavering dedication to achieving favorable outcomes. From minor injuries to life-altering collisions, our attorneys have the expertise to navigate the complexities of hit-and-run cases.

If you’re seeking an experienced Sacramento hit and run attorney, don’t hesitate to reach out. Schedule a free consultation today to discuss your case, understand your rights, and explore the best path forward. Let us be your trusted partner in pursuing justice.

Explore our case results or read what our clients have to say. Your path to recovery starts here.

"*" indicates required fields

Address*
SMS*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

What to Do After a Hit and Run Accident in California?

If you’ve been involved in a hit-and-run accident, taking immediate and strategic steps can significantly impact the outcome of your case and your ability to recover compensation. Here’s what to do:

  1. Seek Medical Attention: Your health and safety come first. Even if you don’t feel injured, some conditions may not present symptoms right away. Prompt medical care not only ensures your well-being but also provides documentation essential for your claim.
  2. Document the Accident: Take photos of the scene, including your injuries, vehicle damage, and any evidence left behind. If possible, note details about the fleeing vehicle, such as its make, model, color, or license plate number.
  3. Report the Incident to the Police: Filing a police report as soon as possible is crucial for both legal and insurance purposes. Law enforcement documentation supports your claim and aids in tracking down the at-fault driver.
  4. Contact a Sacramento Hit and Run Attorney: An experienced attorney is essential for navigating the complexities of hit-and-run cases. At Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys, we specialize in filing hit-and-run accident claims and helping victims recover the compensation they deserve.

When you need a trusted hit and run accident lawyer in Sacramento, Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys is here to guide you. Contact us for a free consultation and take the first step toward justice. Visit our blog for more tips: 7 Steps to Take After a Hit-and-Run Car Accident.

"*" indicates required fields

Address*
SMS*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

California Hit & Run Accidents: What You Need to Know

Every motorist in California is aware of the basic rules of the road. These drivers understand that pulling over after an accident is the law. In the state of California, hit and run offenses can be either a misdemeanor or a felony.

The requirements of a misdemeanor in a hit and run offenses are as follows:

  • Leaves the accident scene
  • Driver does not identify themselves to the other party involved
  • Property was damaged as a result of the collision

A felony for a hit and run differs slightly, which is given when any type of injury is suffered as a result of a hit and run crash. California motorists must understand the serious nature of being involved in a hit and run accident. Drivers who choose to flee an accident do so for a number of reasons. The following are some of the most commonly seen causes of hit and run collisions:

  • The driver is in trouble with the law
  • The motorist is uninsured
  • A bicyclist or pedestrian was hit
  • Driver does not have a valid California license
  • Driver is an illegal alien
  • Motorist was driving under the influence of drugs / alcohol

If you have been involved in a hit and run collision in Sacramento, our personal injury lawyers are here for you. Utilizing the advice of a legal professional is critical in these types of crashes, as quite a bit of research and investigation will be necessary.

Common Hit and Run Injuries

When a hit and run crash occurs, accident victims are often overwhelmed and unable to think clearly. Knowing this, California motorists must have a basic idea of what they should do if the at-fault party flees the scene. First and foremost, make sure that everyone inside of your vehicle is okay. Then, if it is possible, try to jot down the make and model of the vehicle that is fleeing. While the license plate number would be most helpful, this is often difficult to take down during such a chaotic moment.

Next, contact the local police to report the accident. Try to remember every detail as it relates to the crash, as the more information that you can provide to law enforcement, the better the chances of catching the criminal. If you or your passengers feel any types of injuries, even slightly, you must seek medical attention immediately.

Some of the most common hit and run injuries include but are not limited to:

No victim should have to stress knowing that the at-fault party of their crash is unknown. If you or a loved one have been involved in a hit and run accident, contact our motor vehicle collision lawyers at your earliest convenience for a free, no-obligation consultation.

WE FIGHT FOR YOUR MAXIMUM INJURY COMPENSATION

What Is the Statute of Limitations for a Hit and Run in California?

Understanding the statute of limitations for a hit-and-run accident claim in California is vital to protecting your rights. For most cases:

  • Personal Injury Claims: You have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.
  • Property Damage Claims: You have three years to pursue compensation for vehicle or property damage.

However, exceptions exist. If the victim is a minor, the clock may not start until they turn 18. Similarly, cases involving government entities require filing a claim within six months, making it crucial to act quickly.

Missing these deadlines could mean forfeiting your right to recover compensation for hit and run victims, including medical bills, lost wages, and emotional distress. Consulting a Sacramento hit and run attorney early ensures your case is handled within the legal timeframe.

At Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys, our team of experienced auto accident lawyers specializes in filing hit-and-run accident claims and navigating complex deadlines. Contact us for a free consultation to explore your options.

How Long Do You Have to Report a Hit and Run in California?

Promptly reporting a hit-and-run accident is critical for both legal and insurance purposes. In California, the law requires you to notify law enforcement about any collision involving injuries, fatalities, or significant property damage. Ideally, this should be done immediately or within 24 hours of the incident.

Failing to report the accident on time can jeopardize your ability to pursue a personal injury lawsuit in Sacramento or file an insurance claim. Accurate and timely police reports serve as key evidence when filing a hit and run accident claim and seeking compensation for hit and run victims.

If you’re unsure about the reporting process, a Sacramento hit and run lawyer can guide you through the steps to ensure compliance with all legal requirements. At Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys, our dedicated team is here to help you navigate these complexities and maximize your compensation.

Can You Still File a Claim if the Driver Is Never Found?

Yes, even if the at-fault driver in a hit-and-run accident is never identified, you may still recover compensation. Uninsured motorist (UM) coverage can provide financial relief by covering medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages resulting from the accident. This coverage, part of many auto insurance policies, is specifically designed to protect victims in cases involving unidentified or uninsured drivers.

Filing a claim under your UM coverage requires timely action and detailed documentation, such as a police report, photos from the accident scene, and medical records. Navigating this process can be challenging, which is why consulting an experienced car accident lawyer is crucial. A skilled Sacramento hit and run attorney can ensure your claim is filed correctly and advocate for maximum compensation on your behalf.

At Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys, we have helped countless clients pursue justice in hit-and-run cases. Our blog,Does speeding increase the risk and severity of a Sacramento car crash?”, provides further insights into accident risks and prevention.

Who Pays for Damages in a Hit and Run Accident?

In a hit-and-run accident, determining who is responsible for paying damages can be complicated, but options are available to help victims recover. Uninsured motorist (UM) coverage is one of the key protections in these cases. If the at-fault driver cannot be identified or is uninsured, this coverage can help pay for medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages. Additionally, Personal Injury Protection (PIP) may cover medical costs and other immediate expenses, regardless of who is at fault.

Filing a hit and run accident claim through your insurance provider is the first step in seeking compensation, but it can be a complex process. That’s where an experienced auto accident lawyer can help. A Sacramento hit and run attorney can guide you through your insurance policy’s terms, ensuring you fully understand the coverage available to you and how to make a claim.

What Compensation Can You Receive After a Hit and Run Accident?

After a hit and run accident, victims may be entitled to a variety of compensations to help them recover from the physical, emotional, and financial toll the incident has caused. A Sacramento hit and run attorney can help you navigate the legal complexities of securing compensation. Here’s an overview of potential compensation types available:

  1. Medical Expenses: This can include immediate emergency treatment, hospital stays, rehabilitation, and long-term care. Personal Injury Protection (PIP) and uninsured motorist coverage may help cover these costs if the at-fault driver cannot be identified.
  2. Lost Wages and Reduced Earning Capacity: If the accident causes you to miss work or impacts your future earning potential, you may be eligible to recover lost wages and compensation for reduced earning capacity.
  3. Property Damage: Damage to your vehicle or personal belongings in the accident can also be compensated through your insurance, or in cases involving an identified driver, through their liability coverage.
  4. Pain, Suffering, and Emotional Distress: In addition to financial losses, victims may be entitled to compensation for the physical pain and emotional suffering caused by the accident. This can include ongoing pain, psychological trauma, and loss of enjoyment of life.

How Long Does It Take to Settle a Hit and Run Claim?

The timeline for settling a hit and run claim varies greatly depending on several factors. While every case is unique, a Sacramento hit and run attorney can give you an estimated timeframe based on the specifics of your situation.

  1. Severity of Injuries: If the injuries sustained in the accident are severe, the settlement process may take longer. You’ll need to reach maximum medical improvement (MMI) before settling, ensuring that all medical costs and long-term effects are properly assessed.
  2. Case Complexity: Hit and run cases can involve complex legal procedures, especially if the at-fault driver is unidentified. Investigations, finding witnesses, and gathering evidence can extend the timeline.
  3. Insurance Negotiations: Settling with your insurance provider or the responsible party’s insurance can be a lengthy process. Insurance companies often delay payouts or offer lower-than-expected compensation, which may require additional negotiations.
  4. Evidence Availability: The stronger the evidence—such as witness statements, traffic camera footage, or accident reconstruction—the faster the claim can be processed. Missing or unclear evidence can delay settlement.

If you’re facing a hit and run accident claim, it’s crucial to work with a hit and run accident lawyer in Sacramento who can help expedite the process. At Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys, our experienced auto accident lawyers are committed to fighting for your rights and securing a fair settlement.

"*" indicates required fields

Address*
SMS*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

How Do I Report a Hit and Run in Sacramento?

Reporting a hit-and-run accident in Sacramento is a crucial step toward protecting your rights and building a strong case. Here’s what you need to do:

  1. Call 911 for Emergencies: If anyone is injured or the situation is dangerous, call 911 immediately. Emergency responders will provide medical assistance and document the scene.
  2. Contact Sacramento Police for Non-Emergencies: For incidents without immediate danger, report the accident to the Sacramento Police Department at (916) 808-5471. Be prepared to share details, such as the location, time of the accident, and any information about the fleeing driver or vehicle.
  3. Provide Comprehensive Details: Include everything you remember, such as vehicle make and model, license plate numbers, and witness statements. Even small details can help investigators identify the responsible party.

Filing a police report promptly is essential for filing a hit and run accident claim and pursuing compensation. A detailed report can strengthen your case in negotiations or a personal injury lawsuit in Sacramento.

Challenges Victims Face After a Hit and Run Accident in California

While accident injuries are certainly a major concern, many of the motor vehicle crashes in the U.S. are minor. When these types of accidents occur, the central concern typically surrounds the collisions aftermath. Accident victims must take care of a number of critical things in order to recover properly from a physical, emotional and monetary standpoint. This recovery includes speaking with insurance companies, paying for medical bills, property damage repair, and dealing with the pain and suffering that many crashes bring.

Unfortunately though, hit and run accidents have become a growing problem in the United States. In these situations, the aforementioned recovery becomes increasingly more challenging to pursue. In the state of California, all motorists must have some kind of liability insurance in order to legally navigate our roads. California drivers must carry proof of this insurance while operating a vehicle at all times, regardless of travel distance, varied drivers, etc.

When an accident occurs and a California motorist does not have proof of insurance or they have been drinking, they are often tempted to flee the scene of the crash. Hit and run situations create many complications; however, with guidance of professional hit and run accident lawyers, accident victims will have a much better chance of recovering from their losses.

"*" indicates required fields

Address*
SMS*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Why You Should Hire a Sacramento Hit and Run Attorney

If you’ve been involved in a hit and run accident, hiring a Sacramento hit and run attorney is crucial to ensuring your rights are protected and you receive the compensation you deserve. At Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys, we have extensive experience handling hit and run cases, giving you the expertise needed to navigate this complex legal terrain.

Our hit and run accident lawyers in Sacramento understand the intricacies of these cases, particularly when the responsible driver remains unidentified. We have a proven track record of success in helping victims secure fair compensation through our dedication to client-first service and relentless pursuit of justice. Check out our Case Results to see how we’ve successfully helped others in similar situations.

Filing a hit and run accident claim can be overwhelming, especially when dealing with the complexities of insurance negotiations and proving fault. Our experienced attorneys excel at navigating these challenges, ensuring you are not taken advantage of by insurance companies. We handle the legal work so you can focus on recovery.

At Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys, we offer a free consultation hit and run attorney, with no upfront fees, so you can get the legal support you need without financial pressure. Reach out today for your consultation and let us fight for your rights.

Learn more about our legal services and how we can help you with your personal injury lawsuit in Sacramento.

Contact Our Sacramento Hit and Run Lawyers Today

If you’ve been a victim of a hit and run accident, it’s crucial to have experienced legal representation on your side. At Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys, our Sacramento hit and run lawyers are committed to helping you pursue maximum compensation for your injuries, property damage, and emotional distress. We understand the challenges you face, and we are here to fight for your rights.

Contact us today for a free consultation hit and run attorney. Our team will review your case, answer your questions, and guide you through every step of the legal process. We don’t charge upfront fees, and we only get paid when we win your case. With a track record of successful outcomes, we are the best accident lawyers in Sacramento to handle your hit and run claim.

Reach out to Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys now. Don’t wait—let us help you get the compensation you deserve. Visit our website for more information.

LATEST NEWS

Treble Damages in California Trucking Cases

California law provides a specific statutory remedy for victims injured by impaired commercial vehicle drivers when their employers fail to meet federal safety requirements. Understanding when treble damages apply—and how they differ from standard punitive damages—is crucial for truck accident victims seeking maximum compensation. What Are Treble Damages? Treble damages allow injured parties to recover three times their actual damages under specific legal circumstances. In California trucking cases, this remedy is narrowly defined and differs significantly from general punitive damages available in other personal injury cases. California Civil Code § 3333.7: Statutory Treble Damages Requirements for Recovery Under California Civil Code § 3333.7, injured parties may recover treble damages from a commercial motor vehicle driver’s employer when all of the

California Trucking Accidents: Standards of Care

California law establishes different standards of care for trucking operations depending on the type of service provided. While most commercial trucking companies transporting freight are subject to ordinary negligence standards, federal motor carrier safety regulations impose enhanced duties that can significantly affect liability in truck accident cases. Key Takeaways: Commercial carriers of goods generally DO NOT have the duty of “utmost care” Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) DO create heightened standards in specific situations Large truck drivers must exercise greater caution than ordinary motorists Licensed motor carriers have nondelegable safety duties Common Carrier Standard: When Does “Utmost Care” Apply? The Enhanced Duty for Passenger Transportation California Civil Code section 2100 requires carriers of persons for reward to use “the

Punitive Damages in California Personal Injury Cases

What Are Punitive Damages? Punitive damages are extra money a court can order a wrongdoer to pay, on top of the money that compensates an injured person for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. The main goal of punitive damages is not to repay the victim, but to punish especially bad behavior and to discourage similar conduct in the future. Think of punitive damages as a financial penalty for conduct that is much worse than ordinary carelessness. In California, punitive damages are not common. They are reserved for cases where the defendant’s conduct is particularly harmful, intentional, or shows a conscious disregard for the safety or rights of others. Most personal injury cases involve simple negligence (for example,

Settlement - $3,900,000

Car Accident

The fatal collision between plaintiff’s Jeep Liberty and defendant’s Volvo truck left Ryan Eisenbrandt’s surviving wife and parents with a judgment of $3.9 million, but the defendant’s insurance company refused to pay. This resulted in a second, intense legal battle between Plaintiffs and Defendant’s insurance company.

During the pendency of the wrongful death case, Defendant’s insurance company had filed a federal court action to rescind the defendants $1,000,000 insurance policy, claiming that defendant had made misrepresentations when applying for that policy. Initially, the federal court agreed with the insurance company, granting summary judgment that effectively denied recovery to the Eisenbrandts given the defendant was otherwise insolvent. The Arnold firm and the Eisenbrandts refused to accept this unfair outcome. They appealed the federal judge’s ruling to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Ninth Circuit reversed the lower court and sent the case back to the same federal judge for a trial on the merits.

Christine Doyle of the Arnold Firm tried the case in February 2011 in front of the same judge who had previously thrown out the Eisenbrandt’s case. A unanimous advisory jury and the trial judge, after hearing the true facts about the insurance company’s effort to avoid responsibility, found in the Eisenbrandts favor. After four years of fighting for what is right, the insurance company was ordered to pay up.

Settlement - $8,000,000

Truck Accident

Morgan Stanley Class Action Data Breach Settlement Attained by the Arnold Law Firm

Late one spring afternoon, the Arnold Law Firm received a call from Angela, a young mother of three. She was calling from the hospital where her husband Christopher had been air-lifted for treatment of severe injuries from a tragic motor vehicle accident earlier that day. Angela’s mother, a past client of our firm, had encouraged her to give us a call.

As it turns out, Angela’s prompt contact with us was a very important decision for their family. Immediate representation allowed our team to secure critical evidence right away — appropriate storage and analysis of the vehicle to avoid tampering, timely professional photography of the scene, and interviews of involved parties — which ended up being imperative to the details of Christopher’s case.

A commercial vehicle had failed to stop at a rural stop-sign intersection, colliding with the compact sedan driven by Christopher, an active 33-year-old father. The impact caused extensive damage to his spinal cord in the cervical area. Despite multiple surgeries, rehabilitation programs for physical and psychological therapy, and in-home care, his injuries rendered him a paraplegic, paralyzed from the mid-chest. In an instant, life as he had known it was gone forever.

At the time of the accident, the at-fault driver of the commercial vehicle was acting within the scope of his employment with a large corporation. With the employer being directly liable, as such, defense counsel fought hard to minimize Christopher’s damages, claiming that his being unemployed at that time devalued his losses. Our legal team made sure Christopher’s true losses were represented, including his potential income, his options and mobility, his ability to provide for and support his family, and the lifetime of care he now needed. Christopher’s injuries also dramatically affected his spouse’s daily life, resulting in a claim on her behalf.

Furthermore, the extent of Christopher’s injuries were, in part, due to defects involving the dual-restraint system in his own vehicle. Despite the manufacturer’s efforts to deny any responsibility, the Arnold Law Firm established negligence relevant to his case.

The result was a settlement of $8 million — the largest pre-trial settlement for this type of case in the region. Christopher now has the resources to receive the ongoing care he now requires, improve the quality of his life and take care of his young family.

Verdict - $10,200,000

Motorcycle Accident

The Arnold Law Firm is pleased to report that our attorneys received a $10.2 million verdict handed down in Modesto. Defense counsel was Kevin Cholakian of San Francisco. The defense rejected a 998 within the $1 million policy limits three years ago. The highest defense offer was $350k.

The case involved a blind corner dirt fire road collision between a truck driven by the defendant and a motorcycle driven by the plaintiff Dan Nixon. THe plaintiff had no recollection of the collision. The defendant claimed that the plaintiff had too much speed for the corner and lost control. The plaintiff’s son (who identified the wrong curve in discovery) claimed that the defendant was on the wrong side of the curve, causing his dad to make an unsuccessful emergency maneuver. The jury assessed 70% fault to the defendant and 30% to plaintiff.

The plaintiff, now 50-years-old, suffered a dislocated right knee with popliteal artery rupture which has left him with an unstable knee, and permanently damaged lower leg. Because of vascular damage he is not a candidate for knee reconstruction or replacement. The plaintiff’s treating doctors testified that he will require an above knee amputation within 20 years. Past lost wages were $78,000 and past medicals were $570,000. The jury awarded $7.5 million in general damages (3 m. past and 4.5 m. future) as well as all future economic damages asked for by the plaintiff. The jury deliberated for 3 and a half hours.

Settlement - $17,000,000

Data Breach

Infinity/Kemper Class Action Data Breach Settlement Attained by the Arnold Law Firm

The Arnold Law Firm, along with co-counsel at Morgan & Morgan, and Mason, Lietz, & Klinger, and Wolf, Haldenstein, Adler, Freeman, & Herz LLP, reached a settlement in the Kemper and Infinity data breach class action lawsuit, also known as Irma Carrera et al. v. Kemper Corporation and Infinity Insurance Company, filed in the United States District Court Northern District of Illinois, Case No. 1:20-cv-01883. The settlement is valued at over $17 million.

The Honorable Judge Martha M. Pacold granted Preliminary Approval of the settlement on October 27, 2021.

In addition to substantial injunctive relief, the class members will receive access to Aura’s Financial Shield Services for a period of 18 months, up to $10,000 for reimbursement of documented out-of-pocket losses reasonably traceable to the Data Breach, up to 3 hours of time spent remedying issues related to the breach at $18 per hour, and $50 for Class Members who are California residents.

History of the data breach: On April 8, 2021, the Arnold Law Firm and Wolf, Haldenstein, Adler, Freeman, & Herz LLP filed the first class action complaint against Kemper and Infinity in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois entitled Irma Carrera Aguallo et al. v. Kemper Corporation and Infinity Insurance Company, Case No. 1:21-cv-01883. The complaint asserted claims against Defendants for: (1) negligence; (2) negligence per se, (3) violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, et seq. – Unlawful Business Practices, (4) violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, et seq. – Unfair Business Practices, (5) violation of the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.100, et seq., (6) violation of California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 1750, et seq., (7) violation of Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, Florida Statute § 501.201, et seq., (8) breach of implied contract, (9) declaratory judgment, and (10) unjust enrichment arising from the data breach.

Settlement - $18,276,000

Qui Tam / Whistleblower

Whistleblowers Represented by Arnold Law Firm Expose Fraudulent Practices by the Pill Club, Case Settled With California DOJ

The Arnold Law Firm and the Hirst Law Group represented two whistleblowers who helped expose fraudulent practices by a start-up online pharmacy company called The Pill Club.

The company allegedly used fraudulent practices to bill California’s Medicaid program, Medi-Cal, for their services. The Pill Club is also alleged to have violated state laws by allowing nurse practitioners to prescribe contraceptive products to women without proper supervision or training from a licensed medical doctor.

For their part in blowing the whistle on the company they worked for, and as part of California Qui Tam laws, the whistleblowers and their attorneys recovered $4.9 million from the $18.275 million settlement paid to the California Department of Justice (DOJ) and the California Department of Insurance (CDI).

Settlement - $60,000,000

Data Breach

Morgan Stanley Class Action Data Breach Settlement Attained by the Arnold Law Firm

The Arnold Law Firm, along with co-counsel at Morgan & Morgan, Nussbaum Law Group, P.C. and others, reached a settlement in the Morgan Stanley data breach class action lawsuit, also known as In re Morgan Stanley Data Security Litigation, filed in the United States District Court Southern District of New York, Case No. 1:20-cv-05914-AT. The settlement resulted in a $60 million settlement fund to benefit class members.

The Motion for Preliminary Approval was filed on December 31, 2021 with the Honorable Judge Analisa Torres.

In addition to substantial injunctive relief, the 15 million class members will be provided access to Aura’s Financial Shield services for at least two years, which includes a $1 million insurance policy protecting each subscriber, credit monitoring, identity freezing, dark web monitoring, income tax protection and more services. The fund will also provide payments to people who submit valid claims for out-of-pocket expenses and/or up to four hours of lost-time incurred as a result of the data breach. Lost time allows victims of the data breach to be paid at $25 per hour for up to four hours of attested time spent dealing with the data breach. Out-of-pocket expenses can be claimed up to $10,000 if the costs or expenditures are fairly traceable to the data breach.

History of the data breach: On July 29, 2020, the Arnold Law Firm and Morgan & Morgan filed the first class action lawsuit against Morgan Stanley in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entitled Sylvia Tillman et al. v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC., Case No. 1:20-cv-05914. The complaint asserted claims against Defendants for: (1) negligence; (2) invasion of privacy; (3) negligence per se; (4) unjust enrichment; (5) violation of the California Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, et seq. – Unlawful Business Practices; and (6) violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, et seq. – Unfair Business Practices.

Settlement - $3,767,000

Truck Accident

A 20-year-old man who had been married for just 12 days left home on his way to work. He was driving on Pleasant Grove Road in Sutter County in the early morning when he came upon a slow-moving truck. As he pulled out to pass the truck, the truck driver turned left in front of him. The young man attempted to steer back into his lane but his vehicle struck an un-flagged piece of metal extending from the back of the truck. He died in the resulting crash.

Expert witnesses brought in by the Arnold Law Firm proved that the truck, owned and operated by a hauling firm, should never have been on the highway that morning. Specifically, the rear and side turn signals did not work and the rear-view mirror was in a poor state of adjustment at the time of the collision. As a result, the driver, who had failed to properly inspect the vehicle before setting out that morning, couldn’t see the young man’s vehicle as it attempted to pass.

The poor condition of the truck, its lack of maintenance and the manner in which it was operated were found to be substantial factors in causing the collision that killed the young man. The testimony also established that the man had been making a lawful pass at the lawful speed limit and acted reasonably when he attempted to avoid the collision.

The man’s 20-year-old widow was awarded $3,767,000.77, his parents were awarded $185,131 and the family was reimbursed $11,899 in funeral expenses. Though money is a poor substitute for a young man’s life, this verdict demonstrates that drivers who endanger the lives of others will be held accountable for their actions.