Study Reveals Jump Bikes More Popular Than Uber

Posted on behalf of Arnold Law Firm in

jump bikes more popular than uberLast spring, Uber introduced nine hundred red Jump bikes to the Sacramento, West Sacramento and Davis area. The program promised on-demand electric bikes that would allow commuters the ability to travel farther and get to their destination faster in a fun, convenient and economical way.

Uber officials were hopeful that having shared bikes in Sacramento would have significant public appeal and become another popular way to get around alongside the company’s main rideshare car service. The city of Sacramento was chosen for its good weather, flat terrain and overall bike-friendly mentality.

However, a study conducted in October of 2018 has uncovered that Jump bikes are far more popular in Sacramento than Uber could have ever imagined. These shared bikes are becoming the preferred method of transportation for the city over Uber rides. 

Latest Findings on Uber’s Jump Bikes

According to the study, more people in Sacramento are renting Jump bikes (53 percent) than using Uber’s car service (47 percent). This means that out of 16 cities across that nation that use both Uber’s bike and car service, only the city of Sacramento has seen the number of car trips overtaken by the number of trips on electric bikes.   

The findings were focused on ridership data within Sacramento’s electric bike service area with the exception of Uber rides from Sacramento International Airport. This bike service area also encompasses Central Sacramento, part of West Sacramento and the city of Davis.

Company officials, including Alex Hagelin, the head of Uber’s Jump bike program in Sacramento, were surprised by these latest findings. While Uber has been around for years, this is the first time where bikes have become more popular than rideshare vehicles in such a short amount of time, Hagelin stated.

Extending Rideshare Services

Uber purchased the bike-sharing startup Jump just last year. This move was done in an effort to broaden rideshare services and become more environmentally friendly. There are currently 1,000 Jump bikes in service, averaging 6,500 rides per day during non-inclement weather.

Alongside its shared bikes, the company also introduced electric scooters to the Sacramento area. The first 100 Jump scooters hit the downtown streets of Sacramento and West Sacramento on February 8th.

Dara Khosrowshahi, the CEO of Uber, called the company’s Sacramento rideshare program an example of how to get people moving from Point A to Point B in a smarter, safer and more efficient way.

Khosrowshahi hopes the company can help solve large transportation problems for cities by getting people out of cars and onto bikes or scooters. City officials in Sacramento agree that it can help reduce both traffic congestion and carbon emissions.

Contact Our Attorneys for Trusted Representation

If you or a loved one has been injured in a bike-related accident, contact the Sacramento personal injury attorneys at the Arnold Law Firm today.

A licensed lawyer from our firm can review your claim and determine if you are eligible to file a claim against the negligent party. If you decide to move forward, we will pursue maximum monetary compensation for your medical expenses, lost income, and pain and suffering.

Schedule a free consultation by calling (916) 777-7777.

Settlement - $3,767,000

Truck Accident

A 20-year-old man who had been married for just 12 days left home on his way to work. He was driving on Pleasant Grove Road in Sutter County in the early morning when he came upon a slow-moving truck. As he pulled out to pass the truck, the truck driver turned left in front of him. The young man attempted to steer back into his lane but his vehicle struck an un-flagged piece of metal extending from the back of the truck. He died in the resulting crash.

Expert witnesses brought in by the Arnold Law Firm proved that the truck, owned and operated by a hauling firm, should never have been on the highway that morning. Specifically, the rear and side turn signals did not work and the rear-view mirror was in a poor state of adjustment at the time of the collision. As a result, the driver, who had failed to properly inspect the vehicle before setting out that morning, couldn’t see the young man’s vehicle as it attempted to pass.

The poor condition of the truck, its lack of maintenance and the manner in which it was operated were found to be substantial factors in causing the collision that killed the young man. The testimony also established that the man had been making a lawful pass at the lawful speed limit and acted reasonably when he attempted to avoid the collision.

The man’s 20-year-old widow was awarded $3,767,000.77, his parents were awarded $185,131 and the family was reimbursed $11,899 in funeral expenses. Though money is a poor substitute for a young man’s life, this verdict demonstrates that drivers who endanger the lives of others will be held accountable for their actions.