CALL 916-777-7777
Youtube Facebook-f X-twitter Linkedin-in

How Social Media Can Impact Your Personal Injury Case

Posted on behalf of Arnold Law Firm in

How Social Media Can Impact Your Personal Injury Case 

In today’s digital age, social media has become integral to our daily lives. Whether it’s sharing life updates, connecting with friends, or posting about our latest adventures, the vast majority of adults engage with some form of social media regularly. However, while social media offers many benefits, it also poses risks—particularly for individuals involved in a personal injury case. The Arnold Law Firm is committed to effectively helping injury victims navigate these risks.   The Double-Edged Sword of Social Media  Social media has the potential to be both a powerful tool and a significant liability, especially when you’re pursuing a personal injury claim. What you post online can be scrutinized and used as evidence in court, potentially undermining your case. It’s essential to be aware of how social media can affect your personal injury claim and to exercise caution when engaging on these platforms.   Contradicting Your Claims  One of the most critical risks of using social media during a personal injury case is the potential to contradict your claims. For instance, if you’re claiming that you’ve suffered a severe injury, but you post photos of yourself engaging in physical activities, this can raise doubts about the extent of your injuries. Even something as simple as a check-in at a location could be used against you. For example, checking in at a gym while claiming limited mobility or filming and posting yourself trespassing on private property can severely damage your case.   Unintentional Evidence Against You  Social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter allow users to share a wide range of personal information. However, this openness can backfire in a legal setting. Posts, comments, photos, and even “likes” can all serve as evidence that contradicts your injury claims. Even the actions of friends and family members on social media can inadvertently harm your case if their posts conflict with your statements.  Why Social Media Posts Are Admissible in Court  In California legal proceedings, the California Evidence Code governs what information can be presented in court. Generally, out-of-court statements are considered hearsay and are not admissible as evidence. However, a significant exception exists for statements made by a party involved in the case. This means that anything you post on social media can be used against you as evidence in court, as these posts are considered admissions by a party opponent under California law.  Furthermore, statements made by friends and family members on social media can also be admissible if they contradict testimony given in court. These statements may be used to impeach witnesses or challenge the credibility of the evidence presented. This underscores the importance of being cautious not only with your own social media activity but also with the online behavior of those close to you.  The Risks of Trying to Outsmart the System  You might believe that you can continue using social media if you’re careful, but the reality is that it’s challenging to anticipate how your posts might be interpreted. Even with the best intentions, making a mistake that could be detrimental to your case is easy. Opposing parties may twist your words or use your posts out of context to undermine your credibility.  The Illusion of Privacy  Many people assume that making their social media profiles private or limiting their visibility to friends will protect them. Unfortunately, this is not foolproof. The opposing party can still access your posts through mutual friends or by using California’s discovery rules, which may require you to produce social media records. Courts have ruled that there is no social media privilege, meaning that privacy settings offer little protection in a legal context.  Navigating Social Media During Your Case  Given the risks, limiting your social media activity while your case is ongoing is advisable. If you must use social media, consider sticking to neutral activities, such as liking posts or sharing public news articles, rather than posting personal updates. Additionally, it’s a good idea to search for your name online to see what information is publicly accessible and ask friends and family to avoid discussing your case on social media.  How the Arnold Law Firm Can Assist You  Navigating a personal injury case can be complex, particularly when social media is involved. The Arnold Law Firm is dedicated to helping injury victims understand the potential pitfalls of social media and how to avoid them. Our experienced Las Vegas personal injury attorneys are here to guide you every step of the way, ensuring your case is handled with the utmost care and professionalism.  By providing expert advice and representation, we aim to simplify the legal process and help you secure the compensation you need to recover fully. Don’t let a simple social media mistake jeopardize your case—trust the Arnold Law Firm to protect your interests. 

Settlement - $3,767,000

Truck Accident

A 20-year-old man who had been married for just 12 days left home on his way to work. He was driving on Pleasant Grove Road in Sutter County in the early morning when he came upon a slow-moving truck. As he pulled out to pass the truck, the truck driver turned left in front of him. The young man attempted to steer back into his lane but his vehicle struck an un-flagged piece of metal extending from the back of the truck. He died in the resulting crash.

Expert witnesses brought in by the Arnold Law Firm proved that the truck, owned and operated by a hauling firm, should never have been on the highway that morning. Specifically, the rear and side turn signals did not work and the rear-view mirror was in a poor state of adjustment at the time of the collision. As a result, the driver, who had failed to properly inspect the vehicle before setting out that morning, couldn’t see the young man’s vehicle as it attempted to pass.

The poor condition of the truck, its lack of maintenance and the manner in which it was operated were found to be substantial factors in causing the collision that killed the young man. The testimony also established that the man had been making a lawful pass at the lawful speed limit and acted reasonably when he attempted to avoid the collision.

The man’s 20-year-old widow was awarded $3,767,000.77, his parents were awarded $185,131 and the family was reimbursed $11,899 in funeral expenses. Though money is a poor substitute for a young man’s life, this verdict demonstrates that drivers who endanger the lives of others will be held accountable for their actions.