CALL 916-777-7777
Youtube Facebook-f X-twitter Linkedin-in

Heart to Heart Hospice Holdings Data Breach

Posted on behalf of Arnold Law Firm in

NOTICE: If you received a NOTICE OF DATA BREACH letter from Heart to Heart Hospice Holdings, contact the Arnold Law Firm at (916) 777-7777 to discuss your legal options, or submit a confidential Case Evaluation form here.

​​​On March 20, 2025, Heart to Heart Hospice Holdings, LLC (“Heart to Heart”) reported a significant cybersecurity incident to the Texas Attorney General’s Office. According to its report, Heart to Heart recently discovered a cybersecurity incident that impacted its internal systems. A subsequent investigation determined that an unauthorized third party had accessed and acquired private and confidential information from Heart to Heart’s network. ​ Recently, Heart to Heart began sending data breach notification letters to those affected by the data breach. ​According to Heart to Heart’s report, approximately 10,835 individuals in Texas were impacted by the data breach. As the announcement was made only recently, Heart to Heart has not yet disclosed additional details. If you received a data breach notification letter from Heart to Heart, it indicates that you were affected by the data breach. ​ Founded in 2003 and headquartered in Plano, Texas, Heart to Heart Hospice provides compassionate, patient-centered hospice care services for individuals with life-limiting illnesses. The company operates 29 locations across Texas, Michigan, and Indiana, offering services such as nursing and physician care, counseling, physical, occupational, and speech therapy, spiritual counseling, and bereavement support.

WHAT INFORMATION IS INVOLVED IN THE HEART TO HEART HOSPICE HOLDINGS DATA BREACH?

The type of compromised information potentially included:
  • Name​
  • Address​
  • Social Security number​
  • Health insurance information​
  • Medical treatment information
This information is called your Personally Identifiable Information (“PII”). It tells others about you and is considered part of your identity. Businesses are required to secure this information or risk facing statutory penalties, among other legal penalties. Stolen PII can be used by identity thieves to engage in fraudulent activity using your identity.  Personal medical information (a specific type of PII) is referred to as Protected Health Information (“PHI”). It is protected under both state and federal law. Healthcare providers and other businesses who handle PHI are required to protect that information. Like stolen PII, stolen PHI can be used by identity thieves to engage in fraudulent activity using your identity. Quite often, PII and PHI are used in conjunction by hackers. The best way to protect yourself after a data breach is to sign up for credit and identity protection services as soon as possible.  NOTICE: If you received a NOTICE OF DATA BREACH letter from Heart to Heart Hospice Holdings, contact the Arnold Law Firm at (916) 777-7777 to discuss your legal options, or submit a confidential Case Evaluation form here.

Settlement - $3,767,000

Truck Accident

A 20-year-old man who had been married for just 12 days left home on his way to work. He was driving on Pleasant Grove Road in Sutter County in the early morning when he came upon a slow-moving truck. As he pulled out to pass the truck, the truck driver turned left in front of him. The young man attempted to steer back into his lane but his vehicle struck an un-flagged piece of metal extending from the back of the truck. He died in the resulting crash.

Expert witnesses brought in by the Arnold Law Firm proved that the truck, owned and operated by a hauling firm, should never have been on the highway that morning. Specifically, the rear and side turn signals did not work and the rear-view mirror was in a poor state of adjustment at the time of the collision. As a result, the driver, who had failed to properly inspect the vehicle before setting out that morning, couldn’t see the young man’s vehicle as it attempted to pass.

The poor condition of the truck, its lack of maintenance and the manner in which it was operated were found to be substantial factors in causing the collision that killed the young man. The testimony also established that the man had been making a lawful pass at the lawful speed limit and acted reasonably when he attempted to avoid the collision.

The man’s 20-year-old widow was awarded $3,767,000.77, his parents were awarded $185,131 and the family was reimbursed $11,899 in funeral expenses. Though money is a poor substitute for a young man’s life, this verdict demonstrates that drivers who endanger the lives of others will be held accountable for their actions.