CALL 916-777-7777
Youtube Facebook-f X-twitter Linkedin-in

FabFitFun Class Action Data Breach Lawsuit Filed

Posted on behalf of Arnold Law Firm in
fabfitfun data breach lawsuitCheryl Gaston of Colorado filed a class action lawsuit accusing FabFitFun, Inc. of failing to safeguard her payment card information and other sensitive personal data, as well as that of thousands of other customers who placed online orders between April 26, 2020 and May 14, 2020 or May 22, 2020 and August 3, 2020. Allegedly, malicious code inserted on the popular lifestyle ecommerce retailer’s website captured information associated with customer sign ups. Customers were notified of the cybersecurity incident on September 18, 2020. The plaintiff is represented by M. Anderson Berry and Leslie Guillon of Clayeo C. Arnold, A Professional Law Corp. and Betsy C. Manifold, Marisa C. Livesay, and Brittany N. DeJong of Wolf Haldenstein Alder Freeman & Herz, LLC. The case was filed on October 16, 2020 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Cheryl Gaston v. FabFitFun, Inc., Case No. 2:20-cv-09534-RGK-E, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

How do I Join the Class?

If you received a NOTICE OF DATA BREACH from FabFitFun, contact the Arnold Law Firm to discuss your situation and possible developing legal options.

Call us today at (916) 777-7777. No upfront fees.

Settlement - $3,767,000

Truck Accident

A 20-year-old man who had been married for just 12 days left home on his way to work. He was driving on Pleasant Grove Road in Sutter County in the early morning when he came upon a slow-moving truck. As he pulled out to pass the truck, the truck driver turned left in front of him. The young man attempted to steer back into his lane but his vehicle struck an un-flagged piece of metal extending from the back of the truck. He died in the resulting crash.

Expert witnesses brought in by the Arnold Law Firm proved that the truck, owned and operated by a hauling firm, should never have been on the highway that morning. Specifically, the rear and side turn signals did not work and the rear-view mirror was in a poor state of adjustment at the time of the collision. As a result, the driver, who had failed to properly inspect the vehicle before setting out that morning, couldn’t see the young man’s vehicle as it attempted to pass.

The poor condition of the truck, its lack of maintenance and the manner in which it was operated were found to be substantial factors in causing the collision that killed the young man. The testimony also established that the man had been making a lawful pass at the lawful speed limit and acted reasonably when he attempted to avoid the collision.

The man’s 20-year-old widow was awarded $3,767,000.77, his parents were awarded $185,131 and the family was reimbursed $11,899 in funeral expenses. Though money is a poor substitute for a young man’s life, this verdict demonstrates that drivers who endanger the lives of others will be held accountable for their actions.