DWWH, Inc. dba Weir Canyon Honda Data Breach

Posted on behalf of Arnold Law Firm in

NOTICE: If you received a NOTICE OF DATA BREACH letter from DWWH, Inc. dba Weir Canyon Honda, contact the Arnold Law Firm at (916) 777-7777 to discuss your legal options, or submit a confidential Case Evaluation form here.

​​​​​​​​On May 6, 2025, DWWH, Inc., doing business as Weir Canyon Honda, reported a significant cybersecurity incident to the California Attorney General’s Office. The incident, which occurred between August 21 and August 31, 2024, involved unauthorized access to Weir Canyon Honda’s network systems (the “Data Breach”). Upon discovering the breach on August 30, 2024, Weir Canyon Honda engaged third-party cybersecurity specialists to investigate. The investigation concluded that sensitive personal information had been compromised. The exact number of individuals impacted has not been disclosed.  Recently, Weir Canyon Honda has begun sending data breach notification letters to affected individuals. These letters include an offer of 12 months of complimentary credit monitoring and identity protection services through Cyberscout, a TransUnion company. If you received a data breach notification letter from Weir Canyon Honda, it indicates that your information was affected by the Data Breach. Weir Canyon Honda is an automotive dealership located in Anaheim, California. The dealership offers a full range of automotive services, including new and used Honda vehicle sales, financing, parts, and auto repairs. The company serves customers throughout Orange County and the greater Southern California region

WHAT INFORMATION IS INVOLVED IN THE WEIR CANYON HONDA DATA BREACH?

Weir Canyon Honda (DWWH) Data BreachAs of now, Weir Canyon Honda has not publicly disclosed the specific categories of information that were compromised in the Data Breach. Based on the nature of similar incidents, however, the types of information potentially exposed may include: 
  • Full names,
  • Social Security numbers,
  • Contact information (phone numbers, mailing, or email addresses),
  • Other sensitive information. 
This information is called your Personally Identifiable Information (“PII”). It tells others about you and is considered part of your identity. Businesses are required to secure this information or risk facing statutory penalties, among other legal penalties. Stolen PII can be used by identity thieves to engage in fraudulent activity using your identity. The best way to protect yourself after a data breach is to sign up for credit and identity protection services as soon as possible.  California offers extra protections and legal rights to its residents through the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”). NOTICE: If you received a NOTICE OF DATA BREACH letter from DWWH, Inc. dba Weir Canyon Honda, contact the Arnold Law Firm at (916) 777-7777 to discuss your legal options, or submit a confidential Case Evaluation form here.

Settlement - $3,767,000

Truck Accident

A 20-year-old man who had been married for just 12 days left home on his way to work. He was driving on Pleasant Grove Road in Sutter County in the early morning when he came upon a slow-moving truck. As he pulled out to pass the truck, the truck driver turned left in front of him. The young man attempted to steer back into his lane but his vehicle struck an un-flagged piece of metal extending from the back of the truck. He died in the resulting crash.

Expert witnesses brought in by the Arnold Law Firm proved that the truck, owned and operated by a hauling firm, should never have been on the highway that morning. Specifically, the rear and side turn signals did not work and the rear-view mirror was in a poor state of adjustment at the time of the collision. As a result, the driver, who had failed to properly inspect the vehicle before setting out that morning, couldn’t see the young man’s vehicle as it attempted to pass.

The poor condition of the truck, its lack of maintenance and the manner in which it was operated were found to be substantial factors in causing the collision that killed the young man. The testimony also established that the man had been making a lawful pass at the lawful speed limit and acted reasonably when he attempted to avoid the collision.

The man’s 20-year-old widow was awarded $3,767,000.77, his parents were awarded $185,131 and the family was reimbursed $11,899 in funeral expenses. Though money is a poor substitute for a young man’s life, this verdict demonstrates that drivers who endanger the lives of others will be held accountable for their actions.