Posted on behalf of Arnold Law Firm
on May 5, 2016 in Auto Accident
Updated on November 7, 2025
In a new bill recently introduced in New York, lawmakers assert that texting while driving is as unsafe as drunk driving and needs to be treated as such. The bill proposes law enforcement use of a new Textalyzer device to deter distracted drivers.
Current law requires a warrant for law enforcement officials to obtain cell phone records if they suspect a driver was texting. However, the Textalyzer — a digital roadside test based on the Breathalyzer concept used to assess alcohol consumption — could change this process.
The Textalyzer would allow officers to view a suspected distracted driver’s cell phone for recent activity while still at the accident scene. The Textalyzer would determine if the driver had texted, emailed or performed any other phone activity that could have distracted them. If a driver refuses to turn over the phone for the test, it could result in a driver’s license suspension similar to the ramifications of not submitting to a Breathalyzer test.
Mark Rosekind, chief of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, states, “Radical change requires radical ideas.” While critics argue that tests of this type violate the Fourth Amendment, supporters of the new device believe distracted driving needs to be treated as seriously as impaired driving.
Although texting while driving is illegal in many states, many drivers ignore the law and engage in dangerous driving habits, such as updating social media profiles or taking selfies while behind the wheel. The potential legal consequences of failing the Textalyzer test could strike fear into drivers which may prevent distracting phone activities while driving.
Current data reflects the negligent attitudes of many drivers. Vehicle fatalities have jumped up eight percent, the biggest spike in the past 50 years. Crashes involving cell phone usage has risen over three consecutive years to comprise more than 25 percent of total car collisions in the United States. According to the Centers of Disease Control, more than 3,000 people are killed by distracted drivers annually.
Distracted drivers can cause serious injuries and even death as a result of their negligence. If you, or your loved one, has been hurt in a Sacramento car accident involving a distracted driver, contact the Arnold Law Firm. A personal injury attorney from our legal team can help you determine your legal options and guide you through the claims process.
Call (916) 777-7777 to schedule a free case review.
"*" indicates required fields
The Arnold Law Firm reached a settlement in the Morgan Stanley data breach class action lawsuit. The settlement resulted in a $60 million settlement fund to benefit class members.
Learn MoreA whistleblower case exposing fraudulent practices in the state of California resulted in an $18.275 million settlement.
Learn MoreThe Arnold Law Firm reached a settlement in the Kemper and Infinity data breach class action lawsuit. The settlement is valued at over $17 million.
Learn MoreThe Arnold Law Firm is pleased to report that our attorneys received a $10.2 million verdict handed down in Modesto. Defense counsel was Kevin Cholakian of San Francisco. The defense rejected a 998 within the $1 million policy limits three years ago. The highest defense offer was $350k. The case involved a blind corner dirt […]
Learn MoreLate one spring afternoon, the Arnold Law Firm received a call from Angela, a young mother of three. She was calling from the hospital where her husband Christopher had been air-lifted for treatment of severe injuries from a tragic motor vehicle accident earlier that day. Angela’s mother, a past client of our firm, had encouraged […]
Learn MoreThe fatal collision between plaintiff’s Jeep Liberty and defendant’s Volvo truck left Ryan Eisenbrandt’s surviving wife and parents with a judgment of $3.9 million, but the defendant’s insurance company refused to pay. This resulted in a second, intense legal battle between Plaintiffs and Defendant’s insurance company. During the pendency of the wrongful death case, Defendant’s […]
Learn More