CALL 916-777-7777
Youtube Facebook-f X-twitter Linkedin-in

Anderson Berry Presents at NetDiligence Cyber Risk Summit

Posted on behalf of Arnold Law Firm in

picture of attorney anderson berryOn October 6, 2020, Arnold Law Firm attorney Anderson Berry was a speaker for the NetDiligence Cyber Risk Virtual Fall Summit.

He participated as a panelist for the Private Causes of Action under CCPA session.

The session is now available on-demand. The webinar had over 600 views on the day of the event, with over 1,100 people registered. NetDiligence reports that 14 percent of the attendees were new to the event.

The NetDiligence program featured more than 90 industry-leading speakers. The focus of the online event was emerging trends in today’s ever-changing cyber landscape, and it included four days of free, CLE- and CE-accredited cyber risk and insurance webinar content.

Mr. Berry represents state and nationwide class members in data breach matters, including the plaintiff for the first data breach class action case filed under the landmark California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) that came into effect in January 2020.

Settlement - $3,767,000

Truck Accident

A 20-year-old man who had been married for just 12 days left home on his way to work. He was driving on Pleasant Grove Road in Sutter County in the early morning when he came upon a slow-moving truck. As he pulled out to pass the truck, the truck driver turned left in front of him. The young man attempted to steer back into his lane but his vehicle struck an un-flagged piece of metal extending from the back of the truck. He died in the resulting crash.

Expert witnesses brought in by the Arnold Law Firm proved that the truck, owned and operated by a hauling firm, should never have been on the highway that morning. Specifically, the rear and side turn signals did not work and the rear-view mirror was in a poor state of adjustment at the time of the collision. As a result, the driver, who had failed to properly inspect the vehicle before setting out that morning, couldn’t see the young man’s vehicle as it attempted to pass.

The poor condition of the truck, its lack of maintenance and the manner in which it was operated were found to be substantial factors in causing the collision that killed the young man. The testimony also established that the man had been making a lawful pass at the lawful speed limit and acted reasonably when he attempted to avoid the collision.

The man’s 20-year-old widow was awarded $3,767,000.77, his parents were awarded $185,131 and the family was reimbursed $11,899 in funeral expenses. Though money is a poor substitute for a young man’s life, this verdict demonstrates that drivers who endanger the lives of others will be held accountable for their actions.