Posted on behalf of Arnold Law Firm
on January 31, 2022 in Personal Injury
Updated on August 1, 2025
Depositions and interrogatories have some things in common, such as being steps in the discovery phase of a case. An injury victim and the liable party are both subjected to depositions and interrogatories, and some other parties may be, too. However, there are also some important differences between the two.
Below, we discuss some of these differences and why they matter during an injury case.
Both interrogatories and depositions are part of discovery, but they work differently and serve different goals. If you’re part of a case, you might deal with one or both.
An interrogatory is a set of written questions sent to the other side. You typically have a few weeks to respond to interrogatories in writing. A deposition, by contrast, takes place in person, where you’re asked questions aloud and a court reporter documents your answers. Everything is done under oath, similar to how testimony works in a courtroom.
Here’s a basic breakdown of how they work:
Both tools matter. They’re used for different reasons and can work together to strengthen a case. One helps lay things out. The other puts those answers to the test.
A deposition is an important part of the discovery phase after a lawsuit has been filed. The deposition is usually an audio or video recorded verbal question and answer session between the party being asked the questions (deposed) and the attorney of the opposing party.
There are usually a few people present during a deposition, including the attorney for the person who is being deposed, the attorney asking the questions and a court reporter who is recording the deposition.
All questions asked during a deposition must be answered under oath, but the person being deposed has the right to object to a question with good cause.
In California, a deposition may only last seven hours, which is the same for federal civil proceedings.
Unlike a deposition, interrogatories are written questions sent from one party to another. However, just like a deposition, these written questions are also answered under oath.
The person who is subjected to these questions must answer them all or object to any he or she finds unreasonable or unrelated to the case. These objections are usually done by the attorney representing the person being asked the questions.
There are also limits to interrogatories, including the number of questions asked. Each party is only legally allowed to ask up to 25 questions, which must all be relevant to the injury, accident or overall case.
Since both depositions and interrogatories are part of the discovery process, whether they are necessary depends on a few things.
First, for either of these things to occur, a lawsuit must be filed, and the discovery phase must begin. Without a lawsuit, there are no depositions or interrogatories. Next, the case must move through the phases of discovery and eventually get to the point when a deposition or interrogatory would be required to gather necessary information for the case.
There are some instances when a lawsuit is filed and discovery begins, but the case never reaches the point of interrogatories or depositions because the opposing parties come to a settlement agreement through negotiations.
Whether a deposition or interrogatory questions come first in a case depends on how your attorney believes the case should proceed. However, most cases begin with interrogatories to establish some basic facts about the case and gather more information prior to questioning the opposing party. Especially since some interrogatory questions may overlap with the ones asked during a deposition.
The benefit of undergoing interrogatories prior to a deposition is that this provides you the opportunity to provide further proof that you suffered an injury due to another person’s negligence, which may help the opposing side realize it would be best to offer a settlement that would be enough to cover your damages.
Additionally, going through interrogatories before being questioned by an opposing attorney may be less stressful to the injury victim. It also provides the opportunity to get some relief from your injuries before being subjected to a seven-hour question and answer session if your injuries are severe.
Not always. While both are common in civil litigation, they aren’t required in every case. Some claims settle early, before either side finishes the discovery process. In those situations, neither depositions nor interrogatories may be needed.
If you’re wondering what depositions are or what is an interrogatory, the key is understanding how they fit into the bigger picture. They’re tools—useful, but not always necessary. A seasoned attorney will look at the facts, the other party’s position, and the likelihood of settlement to decide whether to move forward with formal discovery.
In some cases, it’s worth the time and cost. In others, it’s not. The right legal team will know when to push forward and when to resolve things without dragging out the process.
Discovery gives both sides a chance to dig into the facts and understand what really happened. It’s not just about gathering evidence—it’s about figuring out where the case stands. By exchanging information early, both parties can size up the strong points, spot the weak ones, and get a clearer idea of what a fair settlement might look like.
That’s where the difference between interrogatories and depositions comes in. Interrogatories let attorneys ask written questions to lock in facts, while depositions are used to see how someone answers out loud when pressed. Both serve different functions but work together to move the case forward. One lays the groundwork, and the other tests it.
Getting ready to answer formal questions in a case can feel overwhelming, especially if it’s your first time dealing with legal discovery. Whether you’re facing written questions or speaking under oath, there are ways to prepare so you feel more confident and in control. Here’s how we walk clients through it:
Deciding whether interrogatories or depositions matter more will depend on what your case looks like. Each has a purpose, but one may end up being more useful than the other based on the details involved.
In some claims, especially when liability isn’t in question, interrogatories may do most of the heavy lifting. They give both sides a chance to clarify facts early and figure out what needs further attention.
If there’s serious injury or if either side is pushing back on key facts, depositions may take on a bigger role. Speaking directly with witnesses under oath can help uncover gaps or inconsistencies that written responses don’t catch.
You don’t have to figure this out on your own. A good attorney can look at what’s going on in your case and decide when each tool should come into play. It’s not about picking one—it’s about using both where they work best.
If you’ve been served with interrogatories or told you’ll need to sit for a deposition, don’t try to manage it alone. These steps can shape the direction of your personal injury case, and the way you respond matters. That’s why having someone in your corner who knows what they’re doing can make a real difference.
At Arnold Law Firm Accident & Injury Attorneys, we offer free consultations and work on a contingency basis, which means you don’t pay anything unless we win your case. We’ll walk you through the discovery process, explain what to expect, and help you stay prepared every step of the way.
Whether you’re filling out written responses or getting ready to answer questions under oath, we’ll make sure you’re not doing it blind. Our experienced personal injury lawyers in Sacramento are prepared to help. Call us today or fill out our contact form to get started. We’re here to help you navigate discovery with confidence.
We offer a free consultation to review your legal options. If you choose to work with us, we do not charge you anything up front and we only get paid if you do.
Get the answers you need today. Call 916-777-7777 to get started.
"*" indicates required fields
Mahul did a really good job. His been very helpful and was able to meet the client's need. His turn time was quick and very reliable. I am happy with the outcome. :) Happy client. I recommend Mahul and the team for the job well done.Jennifer Soto
I spoke to Stephanie regarding a possible case. It wasn't something they could take but she was very knowledgeable and helped send me in the right direction.Elaine Hawley
Truly great people. A great team and amazing effort. They moved very fast with my case and made sure I was alert every step of the way. They are also very welcoming and very comforting in hard times. I would strongly recommend this firm.Ajani_A E
I want to sing praise for Mrs Frances Siria @ Arnold Law Firm. She is an amazing asset to your company, very professional and such a pleasure to have worked with….. I can’t say enough about Mrs. Siria 😃 If I could give 6 ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ I would!Ryan Giboney
![]()
I love my Team Tony! Joy and Larisa are the absolute best! They've helped me emotionally and physically, and they were always there for me when I needed someone to talk to. They definitely walked me through my problems and helped me understand everything every step of the way. I would 100% recommend them!!! Tony has the best support that I could have ever asked for. They are kind, extremely knowledgeable, and approachable. I could not thank them enough! Please give them a try.
The Arnold Law Firm reached a settlement in the Morgan Stanley data breach class action lawsuit. The settlement resulted in a $60 million settlement fund to benefit class members.
Learn MoreA whistleblower case exposing fraudulent practices in the state of California resulted in an $18.275 million settlement.
Learn MoreThe Arnold Law Firm reached a settlement in the Kemper and Infinity data breach class action lawsuit. The settlement is valued at over $17 million.
Learn MoreThe Arnold Law Firm is pleased to report that our attorneys received a $10.2 million verdict handed down in Modesto. Defense counsel was Kevin Cholakian of San Francisco. The defense rejected a 998 within the $1 million policy limits three years ago. The highest defense offer was $350k. The case involved a blind corner dirt […]
Learn MoreLate one spring afternoon, the Arnold Law Firm received a call from Angela, a young mother of three. She was calling from the hospital where her husband Christopher had been air-lifted for treatment of severe injuries from a tragic motor vehicle accident earlier that day. Angela’s mother, a past client of our firm, had encouraged […]
Learn MoreThe fatal collision between plaintiff’s Jeep Liberty and defendant’s Volvo truck left Ryan Eisenbrandt’s surviving wife and parents with a judgment of $3.9 million, but the defendant’s insurance company refused to pay. This resulted in a second, intense legal battle between Plaintiffs and Defendant’s insurance company. During the pendency of the wrongful death case, Defendant’s […]
Learn More