Hanna Andersson, LLC Class Action Data Breach Lawsuit Filed

Posted on behalf of Arnold Law Firm in
hanna andersson llc data breach lawsuitPlaintiff Bernadette Barnes of California filed a class action lawsuit accusing Hanna Andersson, LLC and Salesforce.com, Inc. of exposing her personal data and payment card information, along with thousands of other online customers. Customer data was stolen during purchases made through the high-end children’s apparel retailer’s website, which uses an ecommerce platform supplied by Salesforce. Transactions made between September 16, 2019 and November 11, 2019 were exposed. The plaintiffs are represented by M. Anderson Berry and Leslie Guillon of Clayeo C. Arnold, A Professional Law Corp. and John A. Yanchunis of Morgan & Morgan Complex Litigation Group. The case was filed on February 3, 2020 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division. Bernadette Barnes v. Hanna Andersson, LLC et al. was the first case filed citing the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) in a California Federal Court. Bernadette Barnes v. Hanna Anderson, LLC et al., Case No. 3:20-cv-00812-EMC in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division.

How do I Join the Class?

If you received a NOTICE OF DATA BREACH, you will be included automatically in the class unless you opt out and no further action will be required by you. Class members have a passive role throughout class action litigation. If the lawsuit is successful, all class members receive equal compensation, regardless of the amount of harm they suffered.

Call us today at (916) 777-7777

Settlement - $3,767,000

Truck Accident

A 20-year-old man who had been married for just 12 days left home on his way to work. He was driving on Pleasant Grove Road in Sutter County in the early morning when he came upon a slow-moving truck. As he pulled out to pass the truck, the truck driver turned left in front of him. The young man attempted to steer back into his lane but his vehicle struck an un-flagged piece of metal extending from the back of the truck. He died in the resulting crash.

Expert witnesses brought in by the Arnold Law Firm proved that the truck, owned and operated by a hauling firm, should never have been on the highway that morning. Specifically, the rear and side turn signals did not work and the rear-view mirror was in a poor state of adjustment at the time of the collision. As a result, the driver, who had failed to properly inspect the vehicle before setting out that morning, couldn’t see the young man’s vehicle as it attempted to pass.

The poor condition of the truck, its lack of maintenance and the manner in which it was operated were found to be substantial factors in causing the collision that killed the young man. The testimony also established that the man had been making a lawful pass at the lawful speed limit and acted reasonably when he attempted to avoid the collision.

The man’s 20-year-old widow was awarded $3,767,000.77, his parents were awarded $185,131 and the family was reimbursed $11,899 in funeral expenses. Though money is a poor substitute for a young man’s life, this verdict demonstrates that drivers who endanger the lives of others will be held accountable for their actions.