CALL 916-777-7777
Youtube Facebook-f X-twitter Linkedin-in

California Dog Bite Law: What You Need to Know

Posted on behalf of Arnold Law Firm in ,

California Dog Bite Law: What You Need to Know 

Dog bites are a serious public health concern in the United States. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), millions of dog bites occur every year, and a portion of these incidents result in severe injuries requiring significant medical treatment. In California, personal injury laws provide a legal pathway for dog bite victims to seek compensation for their injuries and related losses. The Arnold Law Firm is here to help you understand your rights and guide you through the legal process.  What to Do After a Dog Bite  If you or a loved one has been bitten by a dog, it is essential to take immediate action. Seeking medical attention should be your first priority, especially for children, the elderly, or those with compromised immune systems, as these groups are at higher risk of infection or other complications. Visiting a healthcare provider promptly not only ensures that you receive the necessary treatment but also creates medical documentation of your injuries, which is crucial for any future legal claims.  Documenting the incident thoroughly can strengthen your case. This includes taking photos of the injuries, gathering witness information, and keeping a record of all medical expenses and treatments. The Arnold Law Firm recommends contacting an attorney as soon as possible to discuss your legal options.  5 Common Injuries from Dog Bites  Dog bites can result in various injuries, from minor scratches to severe trauma. Common injuries include: 
  1. Lacerations and Cuts: These are the most common injuries and can range from minor to severe. 
  2. Infections: Bacteria from a dog’s mouth can cause serious infections, such as rabies or tetanus. 
  3. Disfigurement: Severe bites can cause permanent scarring or disfigurement, especially on the face. 
  4. Fractures: A powerful bite or a fall during the attack can lead to broken bones. 
  5. Psychological Trauma: Many victims experience anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and other psychological effects. 
These injuries often require extensive medical treatment and may result in long-term physical and emotional impacts. At The Arnold Law Firm, we have helped countless clients recover compensation for both physical injuries and emotional distress.  Understanding Dog Owner Liability in California  California operates under a “strict liability” statute for dog bites. This means that dog owners are typically held responsible for injuries caused by their dogs, regardless of whether the dog has a history of aggression. Under California law, a victim must have been lawfully present on public or private property at the time of the bite for the strict liability rule to apply.  However, there are exceptions. If the victim was trespassing or provoked the dog, the owner’s liability may be limited. The Arnold Law Firm can help you navigate these complexities and determine the best course of action based on your specific circumstances.  Why File a Dog Bite Claim?  Filing a dog bite claim in California allows victims to recover compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages. Serious injuries, such as disfigurement or permanent disability, can result in lifelong expenses. A successful claim can help cover these costs, ensuring that victims do not bear the financial burden of their injuries alone.  The Arnold Law Firm has extensive experience representing dog bite victims and securing favorable settlements or verdicts. We are committed to fighting for the maximum compensation you deserve.  California Statute of Limitations for Dog Bite Claims  In California, dog bite victims generally have two years from the date of the incident to file a personal injury lawsuit. However, there are exceptions that may extend or shorten this timeframe. For example, if the victim is a minor or if the defendant is a government entity, different rules may apply.  To avoid missing critical deadlines, it is essential to speak with an experienced attorney at The Arnold Law Firm as soon as possible. We will evaluate your case and ensure that all necessary legal actions are taken within the required time limits.  Filing a Wrongful Death Claim Due to a Dog Bite  Tragically, some dog bites can result in fatal injuries. If you have lost a loved one due to a dog attack, you may be entitled to file a wrongful death claim. Compensation can cover medical bills, funeral expenses, and the loss of companionship. These cases are complex, and the statute of limitations for wrongful death claims is typically two years from the date of death.  The Arnold Law Firm is deeply experienced in handling wrongful death claims and is dedicated to providing compassionate and effective representation during such a difficult time.  Contact The Arnold Law Firm Today  If you or a loved one has suffered a dog bite injury, The Arnold Law Firm is here to help. Our team has the knowledge and experience to handle all aspects of your case, from gathering evidence to negotiating with insurance companies. We are committed to achieving the best possible outcome for our clients and ensuring they receive the compensation they deserve. 

Settlement - $3,767,000

Truck Accident

A 20-year-old man who had been married for just 12 days left home on his way to work. He was driving on Pleasant Grove Road in Sutter County in the early morning when he came upon a slow-moving truck. As he pulled out to pass the truck, the truck driver turned left in front of him. The young man attempted to steer back into his lane but his vehicle struck an un-flagged piece of metal extending from the back of the truck. He died in the resulting crash.

Expert witnesses brought in by the Arnold Law Firm proved that the truck, owned and operated by a hauling firm, should never have been on the highway that morning. Specifically, the rear and side turn signals did not work and the rear-view mirror was in a poor state of adjustment at the time of the collision. As a result, the driver, who had failed to properly inspect the vehicle before setting out that morning, couldn’t see the young man’s vehicle as it attempted to pass.

The poor condition of the truck, its lack of maintenance and the manner in which it was operated were found to be substantial factors in causing the collision that killed the young man. The testimony also established that the man had been making a lawful pass at the lawful speed limit and acted reasonably when he attempted to avoid the collision.

The man’s 20-year-old widow was awarded $3,767,000.77, his parents were awarded $185,131 and the family was reimbursed $11,899 in funeral expenses. Though money is a poor substitute for a young man’s life, this verdict demonstrates that drivers who endanger the lives of others will be held accountable for their actions.