DEACTIVATED Google Inc’s Data Mining Lawsuit

Posted on behalf of Arnold Law Firm in

At the same time Google launched its Gmail email service, Google adopted the motto Dont Be Evil.  As far as the privacy concerns of those sending or receiving email through the Gmail service,  recent allegations may give pause as to strength of Googles pledge.    

Keith Dunbar from Texas alleges in an action pending in the federal Northern District of California, that Google violates federal privacy law in using data from private emails sent to and from Gmail addresses, analyzing the content of these emails without valid consent.  In other words, Dunbars lawsuit claims that Googles technology opens and mines email content for the purpose of making Google more profitable. 

As the attached article shows, the courts are taking Mr. Dunbars allegations seriously.  Describing Googles pace of document production in the Dunbar litigation thus far as disappointing, Magistrate Judge Grewal ordered Google to produce closely guarded documents which will likely shed important light on how Google views its role in respecting the privacy of email communications passing through the Gmail system.    

The Arnold Law Firm is proudly serving as California counsel for a national consortium of lawyers pursuing this case.

Settlement - $3,767,000

Truck Accident

A 20-year-old man who had been married for just 12 days left home on his way to work. He was driving on Pleasant Grove Road in Sutter County in the early morning when he came upon a slow-moving truck. As he pulled out to pass the truck, the truck driver turned left in front of him. The young man attempted to steer back into his lane but his vehicle struck an un-flagged piece of metal extending from the back of the truck. He died in the resulting crash.

Expert witnesses brought in by the Arnold Law Firm proved that the truck, owned and operated by a hauling firm, should never have been on the highway that morning. Specifically, the rear and side turn signals did not work and the rear-view mirror was in a poor state of adjustment at the time of the collision. As a result, the driver, who had failed to properly inspect the vehicle before setting out that morning, couldn’t see the young man’s vehicle as it attempted to pass.

The poor condition of the truck, its lack of maintenance and the manner in which it was operated were found to be substantial factors in causing the collision that killed the young man. The testimony also established that the man had been making a lawful pass at the lawful speed limit and acted reasonably when he attempted to avoid the collision.

The man’s 20-year-old widow was awarded $3,767,000.77, his parents were awarded $185,131 and the family was reimbursed $11,899 in funeral expenses. Though money is a poor substitute for a young man’s life, this verdict demonstrates that drivers who endanger the lives of others will be held accountable for their actions.